The Kolbrin is a set of religious and historical documents pertaining to the history of man on this planet beginning at homo-erectus and the one true creator god of love of the universe
I'm blown away by reading this one for a number of reasons:
- the book explains what evolution is and why it happens
- the book says evolution applies to humans and that early man was covered head to toe in brown or black hair
- it says that the dinosaurs were trapped in the ground and their bones turned to stone during a cataclysm because they were actually too much for man to live with successfully
- it says that mortal life is a character building experience for the soul
- it contains a section on the carboniferous and describes what it was like to live with insects that were the size of you arm (the book says butterflies the size of eagles and spiders the size of a man fore arm and that people were predated on by insects a lot)
- it describes living along side other species of sapien and is very clear on that they are different species. You have: yoslings which were a species of pygmy people that humans interbreed with at one point, you have the people of the land of the small ones, the land of the neckless ones (Neanderthals) and the land of the tall ones/giants who we call Denisovans. Denisovans molars are 2X the size of homo-sapien molars. Denisovans were 8-10 get tall at a time when the average man was 5' tall and the book describes a giant as being 6 cubits tall, which is 9'
- the last apocalypse that mankind lives through in the book kills almost all other types of man than us
- the book contains the account of the genocide of the remaining Denisovans who were working as priests and megalithic temple builders with the "barbarians" in northern Europe or north america (the book is unclear) but it was accessible by sea and it was untamed heavy bush area
- the one true God described in this book is as manly and self secure good who is not petty. He doesn't want or need your worship, or sacrifices he wants you to look deep inside yourself and to develop your own soul for goodness. He even says directly in the book that if it brings goodness to you spiritually, even though it's stupid, you could carve an idol of anything and worship or like God and he doesn't care. As long as it makes you a better person, that's what he wants.
- Gods plan for mankind in the book is develop spiritually in goodness over time but also to meditate and focus on redeveloping and surpassing our previous evolutionary development of the pineal gland so that we can interact on the spiritual plain during our mortal lives. The book says that mankind was pretty much walking with God by having this at one point, but neglected the use of the ability and evolution attrophied it over time.
The last chapter, titled "dark days" tells the story of Moses from the perspective of 3rd parties who were also in Egypt and understood what was happening in the sky.
It's amazing, the cataclysms describes in this book are scientifically accurate representations of commet impacts and solar outbursts.
Paragraph thtee of part 1 on the destroyer days that solar apocalypses happen cyclically because (quoting from the book) "certain laws that govern the nature of stars periodically cause stars to become unstable"
Then it shot off so much radiation and solar wind that it makes the entire sky fluoresce with a red glow down to the equator in the middle of the day. Earthquakes, superstores, fires, at one point st Elmo's fire is described to sweep across forrest and field setting them on fire.
It describes having our second moon destroyed in an asteroid impact and the apocalyptic fallout of that raining down on earth
I genuinely believe that this book may be a part of the great awakening of mankind
Who wrote it?
Anonymous authorship is a thick wall between people and the belief in ancient texts of all sorts. As Thomas Payne wrote, if we are expected to live our lives in service and obedience to a text, it is only right that we should ask, On whose authority? Who says so?
Monotheistic Christian Egyptians, though the texts are far older than the last transcription.
The bronze books were recorded in Heiroglyphs and are literally made of bronze. It's a corrosion resistant recipe and and then they were sealed in a specialised boxk that uses a bi-metal strip to hold the lid. Completely air-tight and designed to last thousands of years.
Survived the catloic church burning down the abbey it was contained in.
The language of the heiroglyphs is called Heiretic (heretic lol) and one of the last chapters is an account of the pharoe chasing the jews accross the red sea
It's an interesting read, because by the time the apocalypse of the tale of Moses hits, we've already read about 4 other separate apocalypse level events.
One was a comet or asteroid that destroyed a second moon that we had and the fallout from the debris and exlposion of it. The other 3 were solar superstorms that culminate in a gemagnetic jerk so intense that it changes the position of the stars in the sky and causes the northern lights to shine in the middle of the day at the equator, coupled with earthquakes, superstorms and St. Elmos fire sweeping accross the plains and starting cumbustion fires.
Have you read any of David Wilcock's books? The Synchronicity Key talks about the kind of spiral nature of time and connects it to the universe being geometric in nature. Like the intricate clock kind of analogy. Connects sacred geometry to the planet, the solar system, on up and the repeating nature of what happens in our world. The precession of the equinoxes, the Mandela effect. He covers a lot of ground. What you're talking about in your posts here reminds me a lot of what I've read in David Wilcock's books. But you may want to read his Source Field Investigations before you read The Synchronicity Key. When he says "Source Field", he's talking about God.
People shit on David Wilcock all of the time because they accuse him of being a grifter, etc. But the guy's written works are impressive. The bibliographies alone are amazing. I get aggravated with people dunking on him when they've never read his work. My theory is that the guy is Apsergers. He's pretty much acknowledged that now. From a young age, he put that Asperger focus into pursuing his interests and he has an impressive body of work to show for it, but all these people who purport to admire "autists" dunk on him for his social awkwardness. Well, newsflash for those people: you don't get that Asperger focus without that Asperger social awkwardness.
Thank you for introducing me here to something I had not even heard of before.
Wilcock's books are interesting. From my perspective, I was thrown when he was talking about being in Vegas and mentioned Oprah like no big deal... lots of us were like wtf that evil witch. I found it difficult to believe that Wilcock doesn't know about Oprah. Controlled opposition? Who isn't these days?
I would be surprised by him being "controlled opposition." Some people say his ex-wife, Elizabeth, was sent in to become his handler. If he really is Aspergers, then she'd have found him a tough nut to crack. (And apparently did if their divorce is any indicator.) I know what you mean about the Oprah thing. I haven't heard him talk about Oprah, but I know that he knows Steven Tyler from Aerosmith personally and we hear not-so-great things about Steven Tyler (though who the heck knows these days, right?). But that connection is because David Wilcock's father wrote reviews for The Rolling Stone back in the 70s, so he got to go to a lot of concerts as a kid with his dad. That's back when you could write for a major magazine and if you got paid $50, you were lucky. Most publications back then paid in copies.
And when was he in Vegas? He's living by himself in his house in the mountains of Colorado these days. But he lived in L.A. for quite a while, I know.
I really appreciate David Wilcock's work. And I've come to feel pretty soft toward him because he reminds me alot of my son, who is very mildly Aspergers.