Well no, not anything..I never said that. But is it possible for somethings? Yes. But a prop gun, would never be able to. It’s like snapping your fingers, and being able to fire a live round. Not gonna happen. Prop guns don’t have the mechanisms, nor the capability to even hold a real live round. And neither are allowed on movie sets. Except by, as ive said, security, or…someone with bad intentions. Which is what this was. Question is, who?
Right, I'm the one saying it. Anything can fire a live round if it is able to provide enough force to the ignition. You can throw a rock at a live round and if you hit it right it will explode.
But a prop gun, would never be able to
It wasn't a prop gun. It was a replica gun being used as a prop.
someone with bad intentions. Which is what this was. Question is, who?
That's a great question! Problem I have in this thread are that people are playing detective and pretending they solved the case
I’m not to familiar with replica firearms. I think I’ve seen some before, not sure. I’m over here thinking what’s the difference between a replica firearm and a real one?
And yea the “who” part is the real question. When we look into the female shot, her history is very interesting. It’s just kinda crazy to think ole Baldwin could be an assassin. I feel he may have been the patsy. But, targeted, directed, but unaware at the end result of, in a way, destroying himself.
There's great information out there on replica firearms being used on movie sets! I recommend checking them out. Lots of people post info on YouTube and independent sites detailing information about that, especially after the incident.
It is crazy to think Baldwin could be an assassin. In fact, it's downright stupid.
Anything can fire a live round, as you said a hammer and nail.
Well no, not anything..I never said that. But is it possible for somethings? Yes. But a prop gun, would never be able to. It’s like snapping your fingers, and being able to fire a live round. Not gonna happen. Prop guns don’t have the mechanisms, nor the capability to even hold a real live round. And neither are allowed on movie sets. Except by, as ive said, security, or…someone with bad intentions. Which is what this was. Question is, who?
Right, I'm the one saying it. Anything can fire a live round if it is able to provide enough force to the ignition. You can throw a rock at a live round and if you hit it right it will explode.
It wasn't a prop gun. It was a replica gun being used as a prop.
That's a great question! Problem I have in this thread are that people are playing detective and pretending they solved the case
I’m not to familiar with replica firearms. I think I’ve seen some before, not sure. I’m over here thinking what’s the difference between a replica firearm and a real one?
And yea the “who” part is the real question. When we look into the female shot, her history is very interesting. It’s just kinda crazy to think ole Baldwin could be an assassin. I feel he may have been the patsy. But, targeted, directed, but unaware at the end result of, in a way, destroying himself.
There's great information out there on replica firearms being used on movie sets! I recommend checking them out. Lots of people post info on YouTube and independent sites detailing information about that, especially after the incident.
It is crazy to think Baldwin could be an assassin. In fact, it's downright stupid.