It is psychology. Wishful thinking will take any suggestion and elevate it to accepted fact ("Is it so? It might be so. It should be so. It must be so."). And then get offended when the reality of the fantasy is mentioned. The crowd on this site have a great need for an earthly savior, whether it is Q, White Hats, secret technology, or Aliens. It is wish-fulfillment fantasy.
I share your concern. But I advise against thinking of this as a "clown world." We are not up against ridiculous boobs; we are up against genocidal psychopaths. They are like the Joker character in Batman stories---except they do not favor fancy clothes or bizarre makeup. However, considering Rachel Levine and the now-fired Sam Brinton, the bizarre aspects are coming out for viewing. This is not funny. It is pathological, and extremely dangerous. But I don't think you disagree.
The people in control aren't clowns, but they made the world into a "clown world" to make it easier to destroy.
But I generally agree with what you say here. The people we're fighting against are very, very evil, and very competent at executing that evil. Not clowns themselves by any means.
I was talking to JackieDaytona74 about people who insist that their fantasy is real. I have no problem with the uncommitted. I am one myself (but I don't bother with fantasies). Psychology is revealed by what people say and the arguments they make. It doesn't require telepathy.
It's assuming that people who directly argue a position believe the position, and are committed. I've presented plenty of arguments I'm not fully convinced on, without making explicitly clear I'm not a full believer in the theory/idea.
Devil's advocate has value, and pushing discussion forward does as well. One need not say this is what they're doing for that to be true.
Yes. It is taking people at their word. Otherwise, they are liars and frauds. But I am talking about people who insist their fantasy is real...not that it is some kind of hypothetical horse for a sophomoric bullshit session.
One need not say anything for all manner of facts to be true. What is the meaning of that point? It is like saying "the sky is blue" or "two plus two equals four."
It is psychology. Wishful thinking will take any suggestion and elevate it to accepted fact ("Is it so? It might be so. It should be so. It must be so."). And then get offended when the reality of the fantasy is mentioned. The crowd on this site have a great need for an earthly savior, whether it is Q, White Hats, secret technology, or Aliens. It is wish-fulfillment fantasy.
I share your concern. But I advise against thinking of this as a "clown world." We are not up against ridiculous boobs; we are up against genocidal psychopaths. They are like the Joker character in Batman stories---except they do not favor fancy clothes or bizarre makeup. However, considering Rachel Levine and the now-fired Sam Brinton, the bizarre aspects are coming out for viewing. This is not funny. It is pathological, and extremely dangerous. But I don't think you disagree.
The people in control aren't clowns, but they made the world into a "clown world" to make it easier to destroy.
But I generally agree with what you say here. The people we're fighting against are very, very evil, and very competent at executing that evil. Not clowns themselves by any means.
Plenty of people are perfectly capable of sitting comfortably at "it might be so" until further evidence is provided.
Maybe don't talk like you know people you know nothing about. Kinda ironic, in fact.
I was talking to JackieDaytona74 about people who insist that their fantasy is real. I have no problem with the uncommitted. I am one myself (but I don't bother with fantasies). Psychology is revealed by what people say and the arguments they make. It doesn't require telepathy.
It's assuming that people who directly argue a position believe the position, and are committed. I've presented plenty of arguments I'm not fully convinced on, without making explicitly clear I'm not a full believer in the theory/idea.
Devil's advocate has value, and pushing discussion forward does as well. One need not say this is what they're doing for that to be true.
Yes. It is taking people at their word. Otherwise, they are liars and frauds. But I am talking about people who insist their fantasy is real...not that it is some kind of hypothetical horse for a sophomoric bullshit session.
One need not say anything for all manner of facts to be true. What is the meaning of that point? It is like saying "the sky is blue" or "two plus two equals four."