That's like trying to tell us to prove that the government would mass sacrifice thousands of people to get us into a war in the middle east on September 10th, 2001. If there's no information out there, then it cannot be proven.
He didn't ask for proof, just evidence. There's plenty of evidence for 9/11 being the government, and plenty of logical explanation to back up the idea with. The only evidence isn't hard "proof". This is the lie of modern science. Is there ANY type of proof for project blue beam outside of what the other guy said?
To be clear, I don't know a lot about the topic and don't have my mind made up either way, just pointing out that there are levels and types of evidence between "some guy said it" and "concrete, undeniable proof". It doesn't have to be 2 to convince people who aren't convinced by 1.
That's like trying to tell us to prove that the government would mass sacrifice thousands of people to get us into a war in the middle east on September 10th, 2001. If there's no information out there, then it cannot be proven.
A study of human nature in all its forms tells us everything we need to know.
He didn't ask for proof, just evidence. There's plenty of evidence for 9/11 being the government, and plenty of logical explanation to back up the idea with. The only evidence isn't hard "proof". This is the lie of modern science. Is there ANY type of proof for project blue beam outside of what the other guy said?
To be clear, I don't know a lot about the topic and don't have my mind made up either way, just pointing out that there are levels and types of evidence between "some guy said it" and "concrete, undeniable proof". It doesn't have to be 2 to convince people who aren't convinced by 1.