It's expensive rigging elections here and around the world, and supporting the likes of BLM, Antifa, and all the anti-american outfits in and out of the country. Not to mention the politicians who vote for this stuff. Gotta keep them on board. Notice not a peep from the GOP????? Where is the giant WTF? from them???
This money would have to come from a bill from the HOUSE. Do you think they will approve such a thing? The senate would have to approve it and then the resident would approve or not. Why does the "GOP" have to say a thing? Am I missing something here?
Thank you for the comment. My point is that throughout the 100 billion dollar "aid" to Ukraine I sense a glaring lack of GOP push back in the form of say, "public outcry". In fact, many of the GOPe supported all this spending. So it is indeed possible this will find it's way through the house. Since, IMHO, a lot of this aid is getting turned around and laundered back into the pockets of the DNC and the RNC not to mention the members and connected (like Hunter for instance) hence my comment.
So, my question is this: has any more of the resident's billions for money laundering to Ukraine been brought by the House since McCarthy became speaker and we have a slim majority there? Prior to this change of faces in DC, the dirtbags controlled the House, so they presented all the bills for the resident to continue his spending spree. I don't remember if they also controlled the Senate. I'd wholeheartedly agree with the sorry performance of the Rs all along, though, and I'm sure a good share of them had their hands out as well.
It's expensive rigging elections here and around the world, and supporting the likes of BLM, Antifa, and all the anti-american outfits in and out of the country. Not to mention the politicians who vote for this stuff. Gotta keep them on board. Notice not a peep from the GOP????? Where is the giant WTF? from them???
This money would have to come from a bill from the HOUSE. Do you think they will approve such a thing? The senate would have to approve it and then the resident would approve or not. Why does the "GOP" have to say a thing? Am I missing something here?
Thank you for the comment. My point is that throughout the 100 billion dollar "aid" to Ukraine I sense a glaring lack of GOP push back in the form of say, "public outcry". In fact, many of the GOPe supported all this spending. So it is indeed possible this will find it's way through the house. Since, IMHO, a lot of this aid is getting turned around and laundered back into the pockets of the DNC and the RNC not to mention the members and connected (like Hunter for instance) hence my comment.
So, my question is this: has any more of the resident's billions for money laundering to Ukraine been brought by the House since McCarthy became speaker and we have a slim majority there? Prior to this change of faces in DC, the dirtbags controlled the House, so they presented all the bills for the resident to continue his spending spree. I don't remember if they also controlled the Senate. I'd wholeheartedly agree with the sorry performance of the Rs all along, though, and I'm sure a good share of them had their hands out as well.