Agreed regarding the security of the order. That's why the example provided in an actual Q-Post seems odd. Also, I wasn't here when Q was posting so don't know if there was any discussion of this back then and/or if Q either stated or implied a particular order in the 0Ds. If he/they never specified then we can't say this recent occurrence of Trump-Musk "coincidentally timed/synchronized" messages does not count as comms. Anon CQVFEFE stated "it has to be" in a specific order and I'm just trying to determine if I've missed some rule, implied or stated, that would agree with this.

On the other hand, the old "no outside sources" comes into play. There are no coincidences. The one facet pushing this towards a signal of some sort is POTUS posting at 22:47 - and I'm assuming here that this is the time he actually posted and not some other time that someone else retrieved it or such. I've gotten caught up before with assuming a timestamp which was not correct, not sure I fully understand these mechanics of the timestamps.