That's a good rundown. Why turn it over to the legal involved in the creation of FTX.
There are several interesting threats in the twats, also this:
"You just don’t understand the bankruptcy process - S&C is a firm with the infrastructure and legal teams required to a massive chapter 11 filing like this. V&E was also able to do so. Who was FTXs existing corporate counsel? It’s very rare for the same firm to handle both mandate"
I guess V&E refers to Vinson & Elkins, which is an interesting string to pull on:
That's a good rundown. Why turn it over to the legal involved in the creation of FTX.
There are several interesting threats in the twats, also this:
"You just don’t understand the bankruptcy process - S&C is a firm with the infrastructure and legal teams required to a massive chapter 11 filing like this. V&E was also able to do so. Who was FTXs existing corporate counsel? It’s very rare for the same firm to handle both mandate"
I guess V&E refers to Vinson & Elkins, which is an interesting string to pull on:
https://www.chron.com/business/enron/article/Vinson-Elkins-settles-with-Enron-for-30-million-1895559.php
SBF's response is interesting too:
https://twitter.com/SBF_FTX/status/1616221677825978369/photo/1
His scheduled testimony before Congress that was pulled:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenehrlich/2022/12/13/exclusive-transcript-the-full-testimony-sbf-planned-to-give-to-congress/?sh=201b2b683c47