Yep. Plenty of gay men would join a crusade against child molesters.
Btw, I'd like to stop calling them pedophiles. They don't "love" children. They hate them. Just like they hate themselves. They are jealous of children and want to steal their innocence and childhood. That is why they do what they do. They are 'child rapists'. They are not "MAPS" minor attracted person. They are not "attracted"
You can keep your 'attraction" and not do anything. But the moment they take any action, even if it's stalking, even if it's looking, even if it's talking; that is grooming and it harms the children. Thus they aren't 'attracted' either. They are pre-kidnappers; they are child pre-rapists. They are kid botherers. They are creeps.
We need a new lexicon because maps and pedophile doesn't work.
"Nonce" doesn't work either (it's british for pedo). Because nonce is used in cryptography as a one-use number (n-once) in crytpographic seeds I believe.
True. My two oldest friends (more than 35 years) are two Gay guys who got married in Calif and now live in Europe... anyway.... no way would they think messing with little boys is acceptable! They are very moral human beings. But I also know a couple total degenerate gay guys and three insane lesbians.
Agreed about the term "paedophile" - you could say the same about homophobic or transphobic. They're not usually "scared" ("phobic") of gay / trans people, they just hate them. I think it's hatred rather than fear that's the predominant feeling.
Agree, "child rapist" is most accurate, but as you point out what if they haven't DONE it yet. (And I do mean to imply "yet" is likely.) So, cumbersome.
Child groomers.
!= "homosexuals"
cf Gays Against Groomers FFS.
Yep. Plenty of gay men would join a crusade against child molesters.
Btw, I'd like to stop calling them pedophiles. They don't "love" children. They hate them. Just like they hate themselves. They are jealous of children and want to steal their innocence and childhood. That is why they do what they do. They are 'child rapists'. They are not "MAPS" minor attracted person. They are not "attracted"
You can keep your 'attraction" and not do anything. But the moment they take any action, even if it's stalking, even if it's looking, even if it's talking; that is grooming and it harms the children. Thus they aren't 'attracted' either. They are pre-kidnappers; they are child pre-rapists. They are kid botherers. They are creeps.
We need a new lexicon because maps and pedophile doesn't work.
"Nonce" doesn't work either (it's british for pedo). Because nonce is used in cryptography as a one-use number (n-once) in crytpographic seeds I believe.
True. My two oldest friends (more than 35 years) are two Gay guys who got married in Calif and now live in Europe... anyway.... no way would they think messing with little boys is acceptable! They are very moral human beings. But I also know a couple total degenerate gay guys and three insane lesbians.
Agreed about the term "paedophile" - you could say the same about homophobic or transphobic. They're not usually "scared" ("phobic") of gay / trans people, they just hate them. I think it's hatred rather than fear that's the predominant feeling.
Agree, "child rapist" is most accurate, but as you point out what if they haven't DONE it yet. (And I do mean to imply "yet" is likely.) So, cumbersome.