Question to all those currently testing ChatGPT and other AI...
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
Has the AI successfully formed a metaphorical argument?
You know, has it used an analogy to prove a point? Was the analogy appropriate to the subject prompt?
For example, saying pharmaceutical companies owning major shares in MSM news outlets is like the "fox guarding the hen house".
Can they understand and utilize such abstract notions in their speech?
I ask, because I think that it is potentially the best way to vet whether or not you're talking to a computer going into the foreseeable future. If someone can describe their view by means of analogy, they're human. Otherwise they are robots (or NPCs).
Consider it the modern Turing Test.
I think I tripped up a few bots on Facebook by agreeing with them when they trash people like our favorite RINO overlords then trashing Pelosi, Schumer, and the rest in the same sentence ... I don't think they're used to that ... especially if it is foreigners training the AI.