I don’t think “freak” is effective. I actually think this Goldman guy was one of the first people to rattle O’Keefe and get him off his game, because O’Keefe usually doesn’t act like this. Usually O’Keefe plays the neutral, calm, unemotional reporter character and uses that to trigger the people he is interviewing. “I’m just asking questions. Why are you running away?” That usually makes the person fleeing look really bad. But if it turns into a shouting match with two people holding cameras in each other’s face, it’s like they both lose, which is a win for Goldman if Goldman previously had the losing hand. I’m not a fan of this Goldman character. Think of it like constructive criticism.
I think seeing someone after them for their crimes could send shivers down their boots.
Still, upvoting you, fren, for your intelligent response. You have a solid and valid viewpoint. However, this could be the point of a narrative shift (if we look back from 6 months from now) ... where our movement must start "showing some teeth".
Again, thank you for your diverse viewpoint. You may be right.
well, list here, fren, this comment is enlightening. I didnt think of it that way, at first, but now that you mention it...
I did feel a little cringe watching James getting a little less professional.
I don’t think “freak” is effective. I actually think this Goldman guy was one of the first people to rattle O’Keefe and get him off his game, because O’Keefe usually doesn’t act like this. Usually O’Keefe plays the neutral, calm, unemotional reporter character and uses that to trigger the people he is interviewing. “I’m just asking questions. Why are you running away?” That usually makes the person fleeing look really bad. But if it turns into a shouting match with two people holding cameras in each other’s face, it’s like they both lose, which is a win for Goldman if Goldman previously had the losing hand. I’m not a fan of this Goldman character. Think of it like constructive criticism.
I respectfully disagree, good sir.
I think seeing someone after them for their crimes could send shivers down their boots.
Still, upvoting you, fren, for your intelligent response. You have a solid and valid viewpoint. However, this could be the point of a narrative shift (if we look back from 6 months from now) ... where our movement must start "showing some teeth".
Again, thank you for your diverse viewpoint. You may be right.
Thanks fren!
well, list here, fren, this comment is enlightening. I didnt think of it that way, at first, but now that you mention it... I did feel a little cringe watching James getting a little less professional.
I think it fits with Goldman’s alleged work supporting raids on journalists.