First, let's establish what "Magic" really is using three old-world examples, so you know how they apply them in their own understandings:
Synopsis: Flute player offers to rid the town or rats by leading them out of town playing his magic flute. When he's successful, the townspeople don't pay him so he uses his magic flute on the town children and kidnap them as payment.
When, lo! as they reached the mountain-side, A wondrous portal opened wide, As if a cavern was suddenly hollowed; And the Piper advanced and the children followed, And when all were in to the very last, The door in the mountain-side shut fast. Robert Browning, The Pied Piper of Hamelin: A Child’s Story
- They Gypsy Woman - The Evil Eye / Stink Eye
There is no singular story on this one, as it ha had many interpretations over the years, but the premise is about the same. A Gypsy woman gets slighted by a traveler, usually a man, and she puts a curse on him by waving her hands and giving him the "stink eye" or "evil eye." Stephen King wrote a modern version of this called Thinner where a fat lawyer gets cursed by a gypsy man he screwed over in court.
- Alice in Wonderland - The Walrus and the Carpenter
Lewis Carroll wrote Alice in Wonderland as an encoded how-to manual to get away with pedophilia. It covers using uppers and downers to prep a child for their memory to be wiped (potion makes you small, cake makes you big). This particular case of the Walrus and the Carpenter is a case study on how to set up a protestant church and the Walrus, dupe a Carpenter (representative of a priest like how Jesus was a carpenter) who doesn't know what you're doing, a useful idiot, and honestly thinks you're trying to share the good news. He's a patsy, and the very essence of a lambskin apron, who will take the fall (gets dirty) should things go south and your plans to molest the "oysters" goes belly up.
"True" Magic
Magic is not about casting fireballs and freezing things with fancy light shows. Magic is convincing people that you did those incredible things without some illusion, scheme, scam, or sleight of hand.
Magic is in the dupe, not the spectacle. The smoke and mirrors is what everyone remembers, because the real magic spell being cast is on the mind, which is intangible. It's more about psychology, but still affects the spiritual integrity of the victim, so we can't say it's all-together an illusion. People being scammed actually believe the scammer is honest, they're getting what service or good they were pitched, and that everything is gonna work out just fine for everyone.
If you tell a man a sword is magic and give him a demonstration, there is a confidence in that sword and himself which comes from the user's mind. This confidence itself is the Source of magic, and can accomplish the once thought impossible. Call it placebo, the self-fulfilling prophecy, or whatever term you wish, the point is that you delude someone into believing something and by the terms and rules of that artificial belief, they use their spiritual essence, their divine spark, to perform great feats of faith.
Effectively, magic is preying on faith. Trust, therefore, is a potent weapon.
The Hierarchy
Even modern stories utilize this trope. For example, in Star Wars the Emperor serves as the Walrus to Darth Vader's Carpenter. Darth Vader believes he can control the galaxy with an iron fist, and therefore balance the force. The Emperor has deluded him into believing this, and when Vader figures this out he believes all that must be done is to replace the Emperor.
This trope is actually the modus operandi of the Freemason hierarchy. The Sith are modeled after Freemasons, and any other such Secret Society. "Always two there are. No more, no less. A master and an apprentice."
So, in Freemasonry there is the Freemason "Master" and then there's the "Apprentice." The trick here, however, is that the only way an Apprentice becomes a Master is to slay their Master and then take on a new Apprentice. The Apprentice is deluded into believing one day they will be a Master, and all other Masters hold secret just how the final act of succession occurs. An Apprentice who doesn't realize this "great truth" will never be "illuminated". If they do figure it out, it means they're viable candidates to become Masters and thus take a seat in the innermost chambers of the Lodge. Same deal with the Sith. Same deal with any other Secret Society. It's how they function.
So, again, the Freemason Apron denotes your Apprentice. It keeps you clean, and karmically innocent. So long as you coach your Apprentice to do your bidding, you get to stay clean. Also, so long as your apprentice follows your orders, they'll appear clean publicly.
Of course it's not always that simple. While they would like to have a 1:1 Master and Apprentice, Apprentices always have their secret Apprentices. Darth Vader had Star Killer, for example.
And so it is, that puppets have puppets have puppets.
In that way, I suppose the Secret Societies are closer to the Jedi order as well as the Sith, but whatever, that's a conversation for another time.
Regardless, that's what Q means by the +++, ++, +
The strings of + connect to ++ connect to +++
Like the Godfather Art:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwVfrDSr/if-you-guys-are-curious-about-wh/c/
"The Godfather III" as Q puts it.
Back to Magic
Alright, let's try to set up a magic spell.
A narrative.
You see, that's the real meaning of a spell.
Spell - 1. A story; a tale. 2. A charm consisting of some words of occult power. Start not; her actions shall be holy; you hear my speel is lawful. Begin, begin; the mystic spell prepare.
First you need people to fuel your spell. You need their energies. To do that, you need to form a demographic, a tribe, which would adhere to your spell as dogma.
Once you collect this crowd, next comes the spell casting. Like a pod-cast. You Tell-A-Vision. A dogmatic motivational speech from your Carpenter followed by the sales pitch from the Walrus. What comes next is a rise to action, usually incited by a False Flag (blame game) and then everyone is fervently seeking your product to alleviate worries and woes they didn't have until you came to town and convinced them that you have to buy band equipment because pool tables are the devil.
In the Gypsy terms, you wave your arms and chant something and the mystery will gnaw at the mind of the victim until they make the curse reality. A curse, a spell, has to be accepted to take hold. Think of it like a contract, because it is a contract. Often times you sign not really understanding you're being defrauded in the fine print. Same deal with a Gypsy Evil-Eye spell. They do some juju and your confusion is your signature. If you ignore it, forget it, it has no power. If you obsess over it, that means you're keeping your part of the contract, whose fine print is "mess up your life."
And then there's also the Pied Piper. Of course, you probably see the similarity to his actions and the theories of DUMBs and the like where they harvest adrenochrome. The current Spell these modern-day Pied Pipers are playing on us is the Trans/Drag spell. Sexualizing children is just the method to reach a goal, which is to kidnap your child's mind away because you aren't paying them for their "services." Likely, though, the Pied Piper is the one who introduced rats into the town so that he could scam them by offering to remove them. He had the means to do so, even if you didn't catch him bringing rats to town, which should already beg suspicion. So, you fulfilling the "contract" which is based on fraud and malice in the first place is actually just a means to an end to corrupt your children. Gullible people don't stand a chance.
That's spellcraft all wrapped up in a bow.
Getting into the Terms
In my post yesterday, I provided some terms which denote themes. Those themes form together to create a [Stringer] which is the literal interpretation of the phrase "Common Thread."
I suggest you look into that post just so you know where I'm headed now.
Water is information. A rag is a derogatory term for a propagandized newspaper. When you fill a rag (newspaper) with water (information) and then squeeze (the press) it out onto people's minds (brains) we say you are washing them.
That's Brain-Washing. You use rags (newspapers) and water (information) to wash minds.
And that's the spell. The Magic Spell is in the language. The above is the mantra, the chant, the charm that they utter which curses you to do their bidding.
Of course, you see the obstacles, right?
In order for a spell to work, so that people can subliminally recognize the connection and sub-consciously accept it, you have to establish idiomatic foundations (bricks) by which to dupe them.
In other words, you have to disseminate among the populace the term "rag" and "brain-washing" and "flow of information" and "surfing the web" so that people can subliminally make the connections like I have done above, while staying consciously clueless to the terms they are signing on to. Once that is established, the excuse these "witches and warlocks" use is "we told you exactly what we were doing, you just didn't understand so you are still the liable party."
That's the same logic they use to defraud you using contracts. They hide behind legalese or some other such "occult" or "hidden" language. They offer to teach you grammar and words in school so you further have no excuse not to understand the fine print they've obscured intentionally, but they do a shit job at it so you don't wise up and realize you're agreeing to a social contract (spell) you would otherwise never sign.
That's the spin cycle. That's the bait-and-switch. That's the scam.
Spells are contracts. They're forms and papers you sign with your cooperation, with your will and spirit.
Dispelling and White Magic
Dispelling is what we do here. We are taking their narrative, their spell, and destroying it with memes and red pills, which are our counter-spells. Narratives which break their own. We humiliate them and get the useful idiots to wise up to whom they are supporting. That's what Q is having us do, and has done so by using a White Magic spell on us.
Modern terms would account Q as a White Hat Psyop. White Magic, White Hat Psyop; Black Magic, Black Hat Psyop -- you see the spell that was cast, right? We on the Great Awakening have a White Magic spell cast on us by Q which induces us to search for spells and break them apart. Like White Blood Cells. It's an obsession all the same, which is the signature of a spell having been cast.
To get rid of the pomp and circumstance, what both sides are doing is quite simple. They are psychologically manipulating people to do a thing. If that thing, that goal, is a positive and honest one it's considered White Magic. If it's a negative, malicious, and parasitic one, it's considered Black Magic.
We just call them psyops today, but the purpose and modus operandi is the same.
To break a spell, you only need to point out that it's going on. There's no eye of newt baloney you have to do, no potion you need to drink, no pill you have to take. That's just Hollywood programming. Instead, to break a spell you need only provide what we call a red-pill, a thought, which you can seed into the mind of another which wakes them up from the spell.
Something that makes them say "huh, I never looked at it that way before."
You point out the scam, and they have no excuse to fall for the scam anymore. It was never in their best interest, so only those thoroughly deluded or gluttons for pain and suffering would continue with the scam once it has been outed. Even if it doesn't take right away, like the Gypsy curse, it will gnaw on them and cause them to doubt.
Just like a heckler in a crowd being wooed by a snake oil salesman, we are pointing out the obvious. We are pointing out the magician's sleight of hand. We're telling the punchline to a joke which is a cruel joke. We're offering up spoilers at the middle of the movie.
That's how you dispel a spell.
So whether you recognize it or not, "you're a wizard, Harry."
https://qalerts.app/?q=wizards
And the ones with Q who cast a spell on us told us exactly what they were doing, in their own way. Because that's how spells work.
The book of Enoch is quite long (which I've read, but don't remember every line). Which part am I supposed to see that will make it "make sense"? You've presented something as some sort of evidence, but left out too many connecting dots for it to make any sense at all. I can't comprehend how the verse you are quoting connects to what I said, much less what Enoch has to do with it.
In addition, while I agree the book of Enoch was likely canon at the time (at least for some people), it is not in any way a part of the religion that ruled the world, nor a part of the Bible (a specific subset of contextual writings, used to create a narrative).
On top of all of that, it doesn't actually address that all Christian religions (really all Abrahamic religions, but mostly Christian) do talk about a "New Covenant" to explain away the drastic change from OT to NT. The entire "sacrificed his only begotten son" story is the main driver of that "change" narrative, a line that is once again teaching us a strict separation from Source, and that We are not Divine.
The entire purpose of the Abrahamic Religions is to separate us from Source. As I said, you can't Rule without that step. And rule us with that belief is exactly what they did; almost the entire planet, for 2000ish years.
Hebrews 13:8
Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
You're attempting to separate the Old Testament from the New Testament and pretend it's something entirely different.
Here's a challenge from the Creator of the Universe to all who doubt Him-
Isaiah 46:9-11
9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,
10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
11 Calling a ravenous bird from the east, the man that executeth my counsel from a far country: yea, I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed it, I will also do it.
Matthew 5:17-19
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
So we see there are prophecies in the Scriptures, which we call the Old Testament today.
YHWH claims He's declared the end from the beginning.
Yahshua reminds us He did not come to destroy the Old Testament but to fulfill the words to the very letter.
The book of Enoch is quite long (which I've read, but don't remember every line). Which part am I supposed to see that will make it "make sense"? You've presented something as some sort of evidence, but left out too many connecting dots for it to make any sense at all. I can't comprehend how the verse you are quoting connects to what I said, much less what Enoch has to do with it.
The Book of Enoch fleshes out and explains the entire Old Testament in great detail.
The purpose of the Great Flood wasn't to destroy humanity, but rather to save humanity. The fallen angels AKA Nephilim were doing their damnedest to corrupt our DNA and they managed to genetically modify all but 8 humans.
In other words, YHWH didn't destroy the planet with the Great Flood until the last possible moment!
Satan convinced a third of the angels to rebel against YHWH after the Flood. Once they were cast out from heaven, they attempted to recreate the Nephilim and corrupt the DNA of all mankind once more.
They set up shop in the land of Canaan specifically because YHWH had promised that land to Abraham and his seed.
YHWH destroyed many of them at the same time judgment came to Sodom and Gomorrah. He allowed the Israelites a chance to demonstrate their faith in Him by destroying the rest of them.
In addition, while I agree the book of Enoch was likely canon at the time (at least for some people), it is not in any way a part of the religion that ruled the world, nor a part of the Bible (a specific subset of contextual writings, used to create a narrative).
It was directly quoted in the Book of Jude, and there are many passages in the Old Testament that are fleshed out even more when the Book of Enoch is included as Scripture.
On top of all of that, it doesn't actually address that all Christian religions (really all Abrahamic religions, but mostly Christian) do talk about a "New Covenant" to explain away the drastic change from OT to NT. The entire "sacrificed his only begotten son" story is the main driver of that "change" narrative, a line that is once again teaching us a strict separation from Source, and that We are not Divine.
Psalm 82:6-8
6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.
8 Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.
The entire purpose of the Abrahamic Religions is to separate us from Source. As I said, you can't Rule without that step. And rule us with that belief is exactly what they did; almost the entire planet, for 2000ish years.
Removing the Book of Enoch and others, including the books of Jasher and Jubilees, was a big part of that.
The Roman Empire renamed itself as the Roman Catholic Church. They separated us from the truths found in Enoch and allied with Satan.