This is a theory that's been going around now for a couple of years and imo it's getting worse..
If you're old enough to remember, when Facebook appeared and blew up there was a large amount of real human activity on there. Myself and nearly everyone I knew were on there actively posting, writing and communicating with each other.
Fast forward to today, I don't know anyone who writes and debates with others on major social media accounts however everyone who does have social media will read comments on public topics and share the posts with others whom just like them do not participate yet share.
IMO it was during covid where they really unleashed these bots online.
I am a financial trader by trade and am part of several forums where I communicate with other traders. Well, the majority are just bots. They are designed to create sentiment towards price.
The scripts they use for these bots are getting better and better. They can blend in with various dialects and even create arguments and debates between humans.
The articles and studies are all bots. Everything online has become bot activity designed to give you an opinion and an emotional response.
Even this site is littered with bots. Any criticism of Trump or Q is met with immediate and repetitive angst and hostility. Even if the poster is just curious. On reddit it is the exact opposite. Any criticism of Obama for example is met with the same hostility.
Twitter same shit. All social media sites and forums are mostly bots now.
The bots are programmed to keep you in a state of total trust and never ending faith. Never questioning anything. Any deviation is seen as a threat and they quickly foment hatred toward you.
These scripts are extremely advanced. They can write and respond to you with human like behavior and can only be recognized with advanced language analysis models.
During the elections it was insanity the "red vs blue" narrative was unbelievable online on several platforms.
Remember the intense mask and jab debates? Well the majority of those weren't human beings online. They were bots from both ends. Any reasonable discussion between real human beings would immediately be infiltrated by a bot that would behave in an erratic and unreasonable matter often insulting one member or immediately spouting extreme responses where it would turn off one of the two humans speaking resulting in a unfinished, anger provoking dialogue.
Really think about it? How many people do you know that are active online in public debates? Or are they simply telling you what they read and sharing it?
Think about the fact that especially after covid and BLM the average person became terrified to write their true opinion online on any platform where their public name, email or identity was at risk in any fashion. This was by design to get YOU out of the debate and to live in "Read-Only" mode.
That's not the point. It's not that defense of Trump or Q is wrong it's that criticism is met with hostility. You see the difference?
Real humans don’t get hostile? Only bots get hostile? Your Turing Test is done by detecting hostility?
Bots with NLP (Natural Language Processing) can chat with you in real time mimicking your typing patterns.
Over 60% of activity on the internet is bots now. Advanced bots that can chat with you on the fly about whatever topic.
Ever heard of ChatGPT?
No, hostility is not the only factor it's one factor. If I criticize someone or something and am immediately met with several responses calling me a shill or insulting me repeatedly without any response to the actual critique it's more than likely a bot.
These bots can be dismissive, they are responsive, can mimic your writing pattern and so on.
Not sure why you are getting offended about me writing there are even bots on this site. It's not even debatable it's a reality of every single forum on the internet.
Are you trying to convince me that you’re a bot? lol
I know about the technology and I agree that there are many bots online. There are probably bots here at GAW, but I don’t believe they are defending Trump and Q. Bots are from cabal. Cabal have the money and the tech to invest into muddying the waters. The cabal have the motivation of normalizing the acceptance of hoaxes, and the motivation of manufacturing consensus. The cabal are anti-Trump and anti-Q, so they wouldn’t invest bots in defending Trump and Q.
Unless you’re accusing the Q team of running bots. That’s a pretty bold accusation, so you could at least give us the usernames.
I’m not offended, Im just annoyed and disappointed that you wouldn’t even name names.
The bots everywhere have two purposes- to cement narratives and influence public topics.
How could you possibly write this and pretend you "know about the technology"?
Q being an advanced script is very much a possibility how could you possibly think it's not considering the entire communication is online from unknown and unseen entities?
This right here sums up your lack of knowledge on this topic. It's not up for debate whether there are bots here or not. It's a fact of the reality of the internet.
It's just a statistical fact. I don't know how else to explain that to you. This is a fundamental problem of boomers or those who have no clue how technology works and how advanced it is.
The point of bots is to agree and disagree with different demographics about a various of important topics.
So even if a bot is defending Trump or Q, that's part of its job.
You stating that the Cabal is anti-Trump doesn't make it a fact. It makes it what you believe to be true. It could be controlled opposition and a bots job would be to cement that belief in your head by recognizing what you look up online and interacting with you in a fashion that would be favorable to your senses.
My comment was in response to Markus. I see the difference every day 😉
He’s trying to move the goalposts from detecting AI to crying about human hostility.
Go on…
🍿
Sometimes KimJung-Un makes good points about other topics, but he has a tendency to peddle “Operation Trust” type rhetoric, that Trump and Q are hoaxes being played on us. When he makes those type of statements, humans who have heard them and debunked them before get frustrated, and might react with what Kim calls hostility. So he huffs and tries to call the humans “bots”
I'm not moving goal posts I threw an example of what a bot would behave like and you got pissy about it. The majority of the internet is bots whether you like it or not. This may be above your pay grade, kid.
And the fact that you wanted me to show you the usernames tells me your boomer mind doesn't even understand this topic and how advanced these bots are.
So the bots on GAW are able to post and comment without having usernames?