This is a theory that's been going around now for a couple of years and imo it's getting worse..
If you're old enough to remember, when Facebook appeared and blew up there was a large amount of real human activity on there. Myself and nearly everyone I knew were on there actively posting, writing and communicating with each other.
Fast forward to today, I don't know anyone who writes and debates with others on major social media accounts however everyone who does have social media will read comments on public topics and share the posts with others whom just like them do not participate yet share.
IMO it was during covid where they really unleashed these bots online.
I am a financial trader by trade and am part of several forums where I communicate with other traders. Well, the majority are just bots. They are designed to create sentiment towards price.
The scripts they use for these bots are getting better and better. They can blend in with various dialects and even create arguments and debates between humans.
The articles and studies are all bots. Everything online has become bot activity designed to give you an opinion and an emotional response.
Even this site is littered with bots. Any criticism of Trump or Q is met with immediate and repetitive angst and hostility. Even if the poster is just curious. On reddit it is the exact opposite. Any criticism of Obama for example is met with the same hostility.
Twitter same shit. All social media sites and forums are mostly bots now.
The bots are programmed to keep you in a state of total trust and never ending faith. Never questioning anything. Any deviation is seen as a threat and they quickly foment hatred toward you.
These scripts are extremely advanced. They can write and respond to you with human like behavior and can only be recognized with advanced language analysis models.
During the elections it was insanity the "red vs blue" narrative was unbelievable online on several platforms.
Remember the intense mask and jab debates? Well the majority of those weren't human beings online. They were bots from both ends. Any reasonable discussion between real human beings would immediately be infiltrated by a bot that would behave in an erratic and unreasonable matter often insulting one member or immediately spouting extreme responses where it would turn off one of the two humans speaking resulting in a unfinished, anger provoking dialogue.
Really think about it? How many people do you know that are active online in public debates? Or are they simply telling you what they read and sharing it?
Think about the fact that especially after covid and BLM the average person became terrified to write their true opinion online on any platform where their public name, email or identity was at risk in any fashion. This was by design to get YOU out of the debate and to live in "Read-Only" mode.
I mean throughout the website. All websites. Can post or comment. They are sentiment bots. They push narratives they are programmed to push whether they be for or against a topic(s), group or idea.
Think of that gold bot c3po from star wars and how it interacted with humans and then 10x it's capabilities online. It can mimic dialect and appear as it needs to.
You have a superior, non-boomer understanding of AI technology. Thank you for educating me. Is that what you wanted to hear? Can we move on now?
I asked about “here” in regards to this statement: “That's funny cause you wrote about Operation Trust, not me. I never mentioned it once here.”
So you didn’t mention Operation Trust on this thread until I did. Fine. Did you ever mention Operation Trust on GAW?
Mention? Yea I've probably commented on it after all I did find out about it from another anon here.
What does that have to do with anything? If you're implying I push that narrative you're wrong.
I'm a long time "conspiracy theorist". I am skeptical of everything. Even certain mods on this site.
The question you should really be asking, and is one for yourself, is "Why do I put all my faith into entities on the internet I know nothing about?"
The obvious answer based on former responses will more than likely be "Well the media says bad therefore good." This doesn't fly for me personally. And I think it's my duty to be suspicious of all those who speak and sound nice but can't show proof of their work without cryptic riddles and "trust me bro".
What makes you any different than leftists who think the vaccine is great because "peer reviewed"?
Criticism of Q and it's promises should be high all the time if you are to believe in their promises.
There are people on here who are actually waiting and excited for the military take over of the country to "purge" the DS.
I find that to be absurd considering the ever increasing police state in this country and the fact that once the military shuts everything down you and I will have no way of knowing what's what. I don't like that at all but some people here peddle it.
These things are why I remain critical all the time.
So this was a lie: “That's funny cause you wrote about Operation Trust, not me. I never mentioned it once here.”
… because you have mentioned it. Maybe it’s technically true that you haven’t advocated the exact narrative of operation trust, but your Trump-as-controlled-opposition narrative is close enough.
Trump can be controlled opposition. Why not? What makes you think he can't? The only difference I see between you and I is you're all in and I'm waiting to see what happens.
And no it wasn't a lie. I didn't write about Operation Trust in my post or comments on this post. You did.
Q is entirely an internet entity. We know nothing about it other than what it has given us about it itself. There are anons who pretend like they know more but it's all subjective.
If he's not, then it's a win. If he is well then at least I won't be all demoralized and surprised and dumbfounded about it.
Why are you offended by my critical mind? lol
What is it that you want? A hive mind where everyone believes everything you believe without question? I find it odd that you're so desperately trying to sniff out something out of me when I've made it clear to you repeatedly where my position stands.