It should certainly halt people in their tracks, force a re-assessment of the movement they have allowed themselves to become a part of.
That said...I'm un-jabbed and currently on day2 of the worst 'flu' I can ever remember. (caveat being I've probably only been this sick a couple times in my life so I could be forgetting that 'baseline'.) I can't fully support the theory that there is no 'wild disease' and everything was just fear-mongering to push people towards the 'cure'/poison anymore.
Two working theories:
(1) There was a lab leak, but it was a 'good' thing in that it released a partially enhanced disease. [analogy: the end goal was to push us from zero to sixty instantaneously, beyond the ability for our (collective) immune systems to cope...the leak provided the potential to bridge that gap.]
(2) More biblical: The 'wild disease' had nothing to do with a lab leak at all and it's actually a product of God, for our benefit. They threw out some origin theories to focus everyone on the 'material', whilst corralling people towards their 'cure'/poison. The 'cure' actually blocked one from receiving the resulting blessing upon recovery. [I can throw some crazy ideas around this topic, like latent/junk DnA activation, but this type of theory isn't so conducive to factual analysis.
I kind of feel guilty hoping for number 2, but it is helping me deal with my current misery thinking I could come out the other side better off.
Who's keeping score? What is this.....like.....variation #378 ?
"experts"
It should certainly halt people in their tracks, force a re-assessment of the movement they have allowed themselves to become a part of.
That said...I'm un-jabbed and currently on day2 of the worst 'flu' I can ever remember. (caveat being I've probably only been this sick a couple times in my life so I could be forgetting that 'baseline'.) I can't fully support the theory that there is no 'wild disease' and everything was just fear-mongering to push people towards the 'cure'/poison anymore.
Two working theories: (1) There was a lab leak, but it was a 'good' thing in that it released a partially enhanced disease. [analogy: the end goal was to push us from zero to sixty instantaneously, beyond the ability for our (collective) immune systems to cope...the leak provided the potential to bridge that gap.]
(2) More biblical: The 'wild disease' had nothing to do with a lab leak at all and it's actually a product of God, for our benefit. They threw out some origin theories to focus everyone on the 'material', whilst corralling people towards their 'cure'/poison. The 'cure' actually blocked one from receiving the resulting blessing upon recovery. [I can throw some crazy ideas around this topic, like latent/junk DnA activation, but this type of theory isn't so conducive to factual analysis.
I kind of feel guilty hoping for number 2, but it is helping me deal with my current misery thinking I could come out the other side better off.
I remember there was a nasty flu going around in 1998 in our office, and there was a Chinese QC manager that had recently left the company.
I got the flu as well, it was a bunch of body aches and vomiting, I wonder if we all were poisoned?
Looks pretty scary to me.