Like it or not, Chat GPT makes data synthesis and analysis much more efficient. While A.I. might take a chunk out of the jobs market, will it be any different to what happened when the automobile came along and started putting horses out to pasture? We are in the middle of massive societal change, and as participants in that change we often look at the worst aspects.
I contend that A.I. can open many more doors and pathways than it closes. Human life is only going to get more complex and demanding as we venture out into the stars. There are many tasks we perform on a daily basis that are repetitive, time consuming, and ultimately unfulfilling. Ideally, A.I. can augment the efficiency of human work by taking over much of the repetitive work, leaving the creative vision for the human.
A.I. are great at many tasks, but they are never going to fully replace the value of human interaction. I believe the future of employment and income will be in the value of humanity, and not in the turmoil of slaving away at repetitive tasks for a menial wage. Post Great Awakening, I believe humanity will shift the focus of what is valuable towards the humanities and all things that benefit the mind, body, and soul.
We must understand that at present we are existing in the Cabal's slave system. We are all enslaved by the economic chains that have oppressed us for generations. While A.I. can be used for great evil by the Cabal, we need to remind ourselves that patriots are in control, and that the future will never belong to the Cabalists and Deep Staters. Their time is at an end, and perhaps A.I. will assist in the downfall of their corrupt system.
AI will never be able to make that jump of intuition or the "let's try something unorthodox". It will always have the V.I.KI. approach from I Robot, "my logic is undeniable".
Exactly. AI (for now, with electronic "brains" organized very differently from organic brains) "thinks" in the way a human's left hemisphere does, which is very useful but dangerously limited. Some comments on the hemispheres:
. . . the right hemisphere is more in touch with reality, and the left hemisphere more concerned with the internal consistency of whatever virtual model of the world it happens to be working with at the time. The Matter With Things, p. 104
In the absence of the left hemisphere, things come alive.
Ibid, p. 160
The hemispheres have different answers to the fundamental question 'what is knowledge?' --
The Master and His Emissary, p. 135 (Chapter 4)
. . . the main point of hemisphere difference (is) division versus cohesion.
IBID, p. 140
. . . context [the right hemisphere's domain] implies change and process.
ibid, p. 141
The left hemisphere is not impressed by empathy: its concern is with maximising gain for itself, and its driving value is utility.
ibid, p. 145
Altruism is a necessary consequence of empathy: we feel others' feeling, engage in their being.
ibid, p. 146
It is mutuality, not reciprocity, fellow-feeling, not calculation, which is both the motive and the reward for successful co-operation. And the outcome, in utilitarian terms, is not the important point: it is the process, the relationship, that matters.
ibid, p.147
And in case anyone should think that empathy necessarily means being soft on others, those right-sided regions include the right caudate, an area known to be involved in altruistic punishment of defection. ibid, p. 147
It [the left hemisphere] is not reasonable. It is angry when challenged (anger is probably not an issue for AI ~ Narg), dismisses evidence it doesn't like or can't understand, and is unreasonably sure of its own rightness. It is not good at understanding the world. Its attention is narrow, its vision myopic, and it can't see how the parts fit together. It is good for only one thing - manipulating the world. Its world is a representation, a virtual world, only. It neglects the incarnate nature of human beings, reducing them to the equivalent of brains in a vat. It reduces the living to the mechanical. It prioritises the procedure, without a grasp of its meaning or purpose. And it requires certainty where none can be found.
~ The Divided Brain and the Search for Meaning, pp. 31- 32
Like it or not, Chat GPT makes data synthesis and analysis much more efficient. While A.I. might take a chunk out of the jobs market, will it be any different to what happened when the automobile came along and started putting horses out to pasture? We are in the middle of massive societal change, and as participants in that change we often look at the worst aspects.
I contend that A.I. can open many more doors and pathways than it closes. Human life is only going to get more complex and demanding as we venture out into the stars. There are many tasks we perform on a daily basis that are repetitive, time consuming, and ultimately unfulfilling. Ideally, A.I. can augment the efficiency of human work by taking over much of the repetitive work, leaving the creative vision for the human.
A.I. are great at many tasks, but they are never going to fully replace the value of human interaction. I believe the future of employment and income will be in the value of humanity, and not in the turmoil of slaving away at repetitive tasks for a menial wage. Post Great Awakening, I believe humanity will shift the focus of what is valuable towards the humanities and all things that benefit the mind, body, and soul.
We must understand that at present we are existing in the Cabal's slave system. We are all enslaved by the economic chains that have oppressed us for generations. While A.I. can be used for great evil by the Cabal, we need to remind ourselves that patriots are in control, and that the future will never belong to the Cabalists and Deep Staters. Their time is at an end, and perhaps A.I. will assist in the downfall of their corrupt system.
AI will never be able to make that jump of intuition or the "let's try something unorthodox". It will always have the V.I.KI. approach from I Robot, "my logic is undeniable".
Exactly. AI (for now, with electronic "brains" organized very differently from organic brains) "thinks" in the way a human's left hemisphere does, which is very useful but dangerously limited. Some comments on the hemispheres:
. . . the right hemisphere is more in touch with reality, and the left hemisphere more concerned with the internal consistency of whatever virtual model of the world it happens to be working with at the time. The Matter With Things, p. 104
In the absence of the left hemisphere, things come alive. Ibid, p. 160
~ The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World by Iain McGilchrist
The hemispheres have different answers to the fundamental question 'what is knowledge?' -- The Master and His Emissary, p. 135 (Chapter 4)
. . . the main point of hemisphere difference (is) division versus cohesion. IBID, p. 140
. . . context [the right hemisphere's domain] implies change and process. ibid, p. 141
The left hemisphere is not impressed by empathy: its concern is with maximising gain for itself, and its driving value is utility. ibid, p. 145
Altruism is a necessary consequence of empathy: we feel others' feeling, engage in their being. ibid, p. 146
It is mutuality, not reciprocity, fellow-feeling, not calculation, which is both the motive and the reward for successful co-operation. And the outcome, in utilitarian terms, is not the important point: it is the process, the relationship, that matters. ibid, p.147
And in case anyone should think that empathy necessarily means being soft on others, those right-sided regions include the right caudate, an area known to be involved in altruistic punishment of defection. ibid, p. 147
~ The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World
It [the left hemisphere] is not reasonable. It is angry when challenged (anger is probably not an issue for AI ~ Narg), dismisses evidence it doesn't like or can't understand, and is unreasonably sure of its own rightness. It is not good at understanding the world. Its attention is narrow, its vision myopic, and it can't see how the parts fit together. It is good for only one thing - manipulating the world. Its world is a representation, a virtual world, only. It neglects the incarnate nature of human beings, reducing them to the equivalent of brains in a vat. It reduces the living to the mechanical. It prioritises the procedure, without a grasp of its meaning or purpose. And it requires certainty where none can be found. ~ The Divided Brain and the Search for Meaning, pp. 31- 32