From what I remember, all of the insets were blank so how could they. They didn't have the information to pass on to their patients. I don't give them a pass. They should have researched like we did.
Indeed. No pass whatsoever for these doctors that KNEW they couldn't possibly give informed consent to their patients. Yes they should have researched, but even more importantly, they should have honored the literal oath they took to humanity in becoming a doctor.
Unfortunately, US doctors got liability shield. Volunteers as well. Nurses as well. Total liability shield. With the approval for kids, it might be total liability shield.
The question remains if people can sue anyone, but businesses they worked for.
Like a time bomb that will destroy the economy and leave big pharma / big gov / big tech unscathed.
That's why we need the Twitter files. Fraud vitiates everything.
Were they even allowed to give proper informed consent?
From what I remember, all of the insets were blank so how could they. They didn't have the information to pass on to their patients. I don't give them a pass. They should have researched like we did.
Indeed. No pass whatsoever for these doctors that KNEW they couldn't possibly give informed consent to their patients. Yes they should have researched, but even more importantly, they should have honored the literal oath they took to humanity in becoming a doctor.
Unfortunately, US doctors got liability shield. Volunteers as well. Nurses as well. Total liability shield. With the approval for kids, it might be total liability shield.
The question remains if people can sue anyone, but businesses they worked for.
Like a time bomb that will destroy the economy and leave big pharma / big gov / big tech unscathed.
That's why we need the Twitter files. Fraud vitiates everything.
Pfizer and others have a liability shield in the US. Pfizer does have a problem with one word in the English language.
KNOWINGLY
Crimes against Humanity knowingly committed do not get a liability shield.