If you are a subscriber, as I am, to the lore that DJT was tapped to help save the United States of America from an internal Marxist take over, orchestrated by the deep state, then you are in good company and I salute you.
Here cometh the red pill for the red pilled. DJT was in or on the periphery of the world we call the DS long before he was a blip on our radar for being an actor on the world stage in politics and such.
After exhaustive research, I find Trump to be the utmost honorable billionaire who ever skirted the realms of hierarchal power and villainy that exists in the multi-billionaire club.
Back to lore, the department of defense as an agency, is the largest employer in the world. The department of defense has also stolen 40 trillion dollars according to Kathrine Austin Fitts and is clearly a DS controlled entity.
And yet, Trump was tapped by hidden patriots, ghosts in the machine of the DOD and 5 branches of the military at that time, to run for president and stop the Marxist take over of America.
I believe that is not only possible but is what happened. However if you think some rag tag bunch of military patriots were the only ones supporting Trump you are mistaken.
If you can believe the former lore than perhaps you should take note of the lore behind the power.
13 families with ancient bloodlines own and control most of the population of this planet. These are the same individuals that own controlling shares in Black Rock and Vanguard, which in turn owns and controls everything else from Pepsi and Coke a Cola to Phizer and Moderna.
The lore continues that 4 of those 13 families disagree with the inbred bat shit crazy majority and think the world would be a better place if there were less controls and if the people where allowed freedom their prosperity and ingenuity would lift this whole planet up to a better world for all.
So if my logic holds true, Trump has been affiliated with and is aiding the minority families and interests of what is still the DS. I am still all in for Trump and freedom and even if I am siding with one faction of the DS vs another I choose the faction that wants to free the world so innovation tempered with love for all can lift us all up higher.
"White hats" is a universally recognized reference to "the good guys." The military association we here may have with that term is valid as is our association with the term with the Trump team. Most normies are not as well engaged in MAGA discousrse as we are and they are more likley to associate the term with "the good guys" who always came to the rescue- like in spaghetti Westerns - from where this depiction originates.
So I am still waiting for sauce about the 4 families of the 13 who might be the closet "goodguys" - or at least the rebellious force from within then Cabal.
But see, we are trying to convey something here beyond "the good guys". Thats the whole point of this discourse.
I couldn't name the 4 good families, nor can I even confirm that there are exactly 4 good families. (I personally don't like to use the "good" vs "bad" I dont think it captures the difference properly. There could be elites aligned with us and yet who might be very bad in many aspects, and there could be elites who are aligned against us in misguided motives and not necessarily bad intention).
I can only infer that there have been good families ever since the history leading up to now. Some examples in the history -
Alexander freed a lot of countries from the banker grip and there is a theory that the schism started between Socrates and Aristotle with the later giving rise to the anti-humanist influence.
Magna Carta was pushed by the humanist Elites.
American founding fathers - while most of them part of secret society - prove the existence of a humanist faction by the way they ensured it was not a captured operation from day 1.
Astor was against the banker elites and was taken out.
Trump didn't come out of nowhere, and the general banking him didnt just materialize without strong backing from one or more elites, most probably connected Kennedy bloodline.
You need to refabricate your theorem with respect to your notion of humanists and humanism, unless it is your intention to separate yourself and your theories from there being the existence of a Supreme Creator God - one who in his Person is the definition of good. This is a pivotal concept.
The concept of good vs. bad matters whether a confused normie is receptive to what really matters of not. These are benighted intellects to start with. You dont decend intellectually to their level, lest you become as they are yourself, and you have no real position that stands apart from their ignorance.
You wanted a term other than "humanist" and I gave you one. Good vs. Bad still has meaning with respect to outcomes. Yet there is also the concept of who is an ally and who is an adversary. At times one can make allies of adversaries (e.g., enemy of my enemy is my friend). But where good and bad is concerned, no such temporay ally of convenience to me who is my enemy at heart is ever truly a White Hat - merely a tool to use in warfare that advances the ball - the conservative cause - down the field.
If some day they become red-pilled,more power to them -they will not join the ranks of the White Hats themselves until then. Some of the best conservative leaders were once liberals, but they had their epiphany and have a sense of why they now believe what they believe, because their prior way of thinking was tested, and found wanting.
My definition of Humanist is simple - Those who want to use their spiritual knowledge for the upliftment of Humanity. We need to take back words or else we will be forever beholden to them.
Ever hear the old adage: "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."?
Humanism is man's attempt at being "good" in his own eyes without the influence of God - the Unversal standard which defines Good. At the root of the word, "God", is "good."
A humanist is one who, at his best, attempts at being good without the influence of God. And this is where man substitutes his idea of good (which absent from God is Satan's idea of good). It is that black and white of a concept. Hence Black Hats vs White Hats is a crystallizing concept, that is, if you are the one who chooses to lead the discussion with normies.
Until normies have a solid concept of right and wrong and there is a basis for establishing that which is right or is wrong you are talking to a wall of ignorance into which your conversant refuses to allow light of Truth to shine. Don't dumb down the concept of good and evil, right and wrong in your discussion in order to score a false win with your opponent. You will only reduce your argument to their insipid level.
Humanists and humanism envision the godless utopian state.
There is no positive word to be taken back from the language in the context of humanism, if one believes God's Word is the Bible the scriptures clearly say,
“The heart is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked; Who can know it? I, the LORD, search the heart, I test the mind, Even to give every man according to his ways, According to the fruit of his doings." (Jeremiah 17:9-10).
"There is none that doeth good - no, not one." (Romans 3:12).
"All of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous acts are like filthy rags; we all shrivel up like a leaf, and like the wind our sins sweep us away." (Isaiah 64:6)
The holy Scriptures inform us that Man is not basically good. Man is basically evil. Our Forefathers founded a country as informed by these facts, hence the checks and balances which are built into our Constitution.
Normies who come to understand this we call the "red-pilled." Until then, they are among the hopeless. Spend your intellectual ammunition wisely.