“That infringement threatens not just significant monetary damages, but the potential for injunctive relief that would threaten Twitter’s ongoing business as currently operated.”
This feels like an extremely important part of this story that no one is even discussing. What ended up happening here?
“Mr. Zatko alleges that:
Twitter’s platform is built in significant part on the misappropriation and infringement of third party intellectual property”
https://twitter.com/sparklingruby/status/1620625924097179649?s=20&t=8yV-HY-qn0MdTaQQOI5iTQ
or that The CIA stole the tech from someone elas and then told Jack to " add this code to your platform" not telling them that CIA stole it is a bit lake a honey trap once Twitter had built significantly more code dependant on the stolen code.. CIA sort of had them by their feathery little balls...
Are you assuming that twatter was created organically by Dorsey?
I Don't know that Ibwould go that far.