How is it a garbage case?
I've seen where only a low percentage get heard. Didn't this process just go down in early January? How many times can the same case be glanced at and rejected before it gets to be ruled on. I'm no lawyer.
There were some very indepth posts made about this after it failed to be taken up by the SC the first time. Try doing a search on Brunson here and it should bring some of them up.
How many times can the same case be glanced at and rejected before it gets to be ruled on.
Probably indefinitely. Or until the SC puts some sort of cease and desist on them, if that is possible. If the SC deems the case has no merit, that's not going to change, no matter how many times it's presented for review.
So it equals "garbage" because "do your own research" some "probablys" a little bit of "what ifs" and then a bunch of "They can't rule on it legally"...got it.
How is it a garbage case? I've seen where only a low percentage get heard. Didn't this process just go down in early January? How many times can the same case be glanced at and rejected before it gets to be ruled on. I'm no lawyer.
There were some very indepth posts made about this after it failed to be taken up by the SC the first time. Try doing a search on Brunson here and it should bring some of them up.
Probably indefinitely. Or until the SC puts some sort of cease and desist on them, if that is possible. If the SC deems the case has no merit, that's not going to change, no matter how many times it's presented for review.
So it equals "garbage" because "do your own research" some "probablys" a little bit of "what ifs" and then a bunch of "They can't rule on it legally"...got it.
It’s a garbage case because the brothers are asking for a remedy that SCOTUS is prohibited from fulfilling according to the Constitution.
Only the Congress itself or the voters can unseat a duly elected member.
Imagine if the SCOTUS could unseat the POTUS.
DJT would’ve lasted less than 10 seconds in the WH.