That's what I have read. And it explains perfectly why Putin is so insistent on the SMO terminology, and imposes civil penalties for any claims otherwise. I think he wants to be able to use this legality in any dispute within the United Nations. This is one of the reasons why he is at pains to stress "demilitarization" and "deNazification" as the goals as it fits squarely within the legal language.
absolutely yes it explains alot,.that bit about the UN & Russian signed Document which allows Russia the scope to Denazify & demillitarize any former combatant country,do you have that document at all would be great or if you can link me to it cheers
I've only read references to it and I'm not that great an internet scholar. A thing to remember (among us theorists) is that the validity of a theory is often gauged by its explanatory power. Particularly if there is an "Oh, I hadn't thought of that!" element. Unexpected explanations are evidence against a concocted explanation.
I have often wondered why Putin is so much at pains to refer to the action in Ukraine as a "Special Military Operation." And why he bites the ass of anyone who refers to it otherwise. Without explanation, it seems like crotchety behavior. With this in mind, it makes sense.
That's what I have read. And it explains perfectly why Putin is so insistent on the SMO terminology, and imposes civil penalties for any claims otherwise. I think he wants to be able to use this legality in any dispute within the United Nations. This is one of the reasons why he is at pains to stress "demilitarization" and "deNazification" as the goals as it fits squarely within the legal language.
absolutely yes it explains alot,.that bit about the UN & Russian signed Document which allows Russia the scope to Denazify & demillitarize any former combatant country,do you have that document at all would be great or if you can link me to it cheers
I've only read references to it and I'm not that great an internet scholar. A thing to remember (among us theorists) is that the validity of a theory is often gauged by its explanatory power. Particularly if there is an "Oh, I hadn't thought of that!" element. Unexpected explanations are evidence against a concocted explanation.
I have often wondered why Putin is so much at pains to refer to the action in Ukraine as a "Special Military Operation." And why he bites the ass of anyone who refers to it otherwise. Without explanation, it seems like crotchety behavior. With this in mind, it makes sense.
absolutely,..cheers fren,..