Iran hates zionists, not Jews.
I dunno. Not convinced.
Man I hope trump is getting more and more pissed at Israel. Remember last year when they pulled a stunt like this too?
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acdcEe2f9Yk Second vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_6IBnrAeyA
Basically people are claiming that Netanyahu was hit by an Iranian missile, and now there is an AI-powered PR campaign trying to prove he's still around. The youtuber shows some of these clips which do appear problematic.
Thoughts?
don't hold your breath on that one
All that is needed to truly block that is a single missile taking out a ship going through the narrow part. It would be blocked for months, no navies required
Is that word from Julie Green?
agreed. he's being charged with possession, and having machine guns? lol
Jacob took with his own guile what God had promised him (Gen 25 the older shall serve the younger).
Esau became the nation of Edom. A hundred or so years before Christ the Jews (Judah) conquered Edom and absorbed them into their own population. Ever since this time, Edomites have accounted for roughly half of the Jewish population.
Later the Khazarians further diluted the gene pool (by a lot), but that's an aside from your question.
Basically because Edom has become inextricably intertwined with Judah, all the unfulfilled prophesies about Edom now apply to the Jewish people as well.
In 1 Chr 5:1, we read "These were the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel. Though he was the firstborn, his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph son of Israel, because Reuben defiled his father’s bed. So he is not reckoned according to birthright. 2And though Judah prevailed over his brothers and a ruler came from him, the birthright belonged to Joseph."
So the scepter (right to rule) was given to Judah by Jacob (Israel), but the birthright (right to carry the name) was given to the tribes of Joseph. Only when they are united can a king from the line of Judah legitimately rule the nation called Israel. You see this in after Solomon - the northern nations (Israel) split from Judah - but the north kept the name Israel and Judah was called... Judah.
And when the modern state of Israel was created, Judah/Edom stole the name Israel back from Jacob, taking it illegitimately.
Thus Jacob's deceit reaped a long term harvest in kind.
Ain't that a trick eh?
I wonder what the delta is between ‘oh noes… trump is covering for Epstein’ and today is? Feels like around 170 days but I haven’t done the math.
Newsflash…. Destroying the physical premises does not change anything in the spiritual plane. For that, you need the blood of Jesus.
As a fellow Canuck, I second the OP's fantastic question. I'd love to know the answers too.
The leftist drones are controlled by Israel.
Jews basically invented the left - just look at any founder of a leftist organization or philosophy... you will find a Jew at ground zero.
To be part of Israel, one's tribe has to be connected to the tribes of Joseph, which were given the birthright.
1 Chronicles 5... 1Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel—he was indeed the firstborn, but because he defiled his father’s bed, his birthright was given to the sons of Joseph, the son of Israel, so that the genealogy is not listed according to the birthright; 2yet Judah prevailed over his brothers, and from him came a ruler, although the birthright was Joseph’s— 3the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel were Hanoch, Pallu, Hezron, and Carmi...
The scepter was given to Judah (in Genesis), so when the tribes were all united (ie under King David) it was Judah that ruled (David was from Judah)... AND they got to use the name of Israel, which the tribes of Joseph had the right to.
As soon as they split, what happened? The northern tribes kept the name Israel because the tribes of Joseph (Ephraim and Manesseh) were in that group, and the remainder had to give up the name Israel and became known simply as Judah.
NOT Israel.
The Bible is quite clear in this distinction.
Modern day Israel claims to be populated by Jews from Judah (genetically, there's a whole other bag of beans going on there - they're about 50% Edomite because Judah absorbed Edom around 100BC - and then of course they have a ton of Ashkenazi blood which descends from Gog and Magog - not Abrahamic lineage at all.
Anyhow, for modern day Israel (Jews) to claim the name Israel actually goes against Biblical convention. They should be calling themselves Judah, if anything, until such time as they can show they have Ephraim or Manasseh there too.
Hamas will lay down arms when Israel tells them to. Don’t get caught in their lies. The oldest trick in the book is to control both sides of a conflict and thus perfectly guarantee your desired outcome. The Zionists are exceptionally good at this.
In trading terms, breaking resistance needs to happen on different timeframes, and once price breaks out, that resistance will almost always be retested as support.
Based on this I think it’s feasible we either waffle around under 48-50 resistance for a bit then punch through, or punch it without waffling. Either way, I think we see some nice movement probably followed by a strong pullback to the $50 mark. This is where the old resistance becomes the new support. It will feel crappy when it happens but it’s super important for future price growth.
Another thing I’ve heard people talking about is the ginormous multi decade cup and handle pattern. This is indeed a fantastic setup, but once again, once it does the initial movement it’s going to retest that support before the main move comes.
Disclaimer: I’m no pro just someone who trades now and then. But checkout what I’m saying, it’s textbook.
The wildcard is what the dollar is actually worth in buying power at that point.
Israel created Hamas to destabilize the area and prevent international recognition of Palestine as a nation. They still control them, and clearly, still fund them too.
Well I think the theory raises questions that deserve answering, but foremost in my mind is why would Israel both take him out AND let him live, albiet in exile as it were?
It would be pretty hard for a guy like Charlie to live in exile away from family and everything he had going on, though I suppose if you buy the line that he was playing a role from the beginning, this would be possible. The Snake Eyes post a couple days ago lends some credibility to playing a role.
To my thinking - I need to see the motive for something like this from the various parties involved. Just having a theory about the facts that doesn't fit with motives is weak.
The other thing that struck me is whatever anyone says about Charlie's life - in his death (or memorium, at least), tens of thousands were worshipping God and the gospel was presented to millions. I have a bit of a hard time thinking if he was some Zionist stooge that this would have happened.
And if he WERE a zionist asset - why in the world would he start questioning them in public? Was he starting to go rogue?
How does one get Andre the Giant's brother to be your security guard?
Wikipedia is working really dang hard to see into the future a whole day ahead of time. Didn't know their writers were that gifted.
I did, but then you should see my bingo card, every square is "Israel" LOL
lol I actually watched that movie recently, due to seeing it referenced hundreds of times like this. While it’s a cool premise, the movie itself was terrible lol.
“Tells what to do” has a different meaning when black mail is involved