Because it’s asking the SCOTUS to go against the Constitution.
The B brothers are asking the SCOTUS to unseat elected members from the executive and legislative branches, only the Congress or the voters can do that.
This case has no standing because they’re asking the SCOTUS to go against the Constitution.
You claimed that SCOTUS cannot unseat elected members. It can be done. As to whether failing to do their job merits unseating, that is a gray area. You don't get to decide for them, however.
The case needs to be actually read before it gets voted on. The SCOTUS didn't even pick it the last time to be read when it was in conference.
Because it’s asking the SCOTUS to go against the Constitution.
The B brothers are asking the SCOTUS to unseat elected members from the executive and legislative branches, only the Congress or the voters can do that.
This case has no standing because they’re asking the SCOTUS to go against the Constitution.
Either they’re dumb, or they’re grifters.
If the Supreme Court can't unseat members elected by fraud, you might as well throw away the constitution.
And yet here we are.
This case isn’t asking to remove congress members because of fraud.
They’re asking to remove members because they “broke their oath”.
You claimed that SCOTUS cannot unseat elected members. It can be done. As to whether failing to do their job merits unseating, that is a gray area. You don't get to decide for them, however.