Too many of us worry about spike protein shedding. We jump from the (non-existent) pan of the virus into the fire of its surface proteins.
This brings up something I wonder about: a viron is said to be incredibly small, and no image has ever been captured. So a protein sitting on top of it (any protein really) is far smaller. Yet, those in that world talk about protein folding.
Maybe proteins really do fold, but how do they know that, let alone know in what manner they fold?
You're asking the exact right questions. How can they know when they can't see "life" at this small a level to begin with.
It's the same as how all the "experts" knew viruses caused rabies, smallpox, Spanish flu, polio, etc. in the 1870-1932 time frame which was before the electron microscope was invented. Now, had they not destroyed Royal Rife's life and his dark field microscope, they would have to come to discover the truth of the matter at the tail end of this time period.
Too many of us worry about spike protein shedding. We jump from the (non-existent) pan of the virus into the fire of its surface proteins.
This brings up something I wonder about: a viron is said to be incredibly small, and no image has ever been captured. So a protein sitting on top of it (any protein really) is far smaller. Yet, those in that world talk about protein folding.
Maybe proteins really do fold, but how do they know that, let alone know in what manner they fold?
You're asking the exact right questions. How can they know when they can't see "life" at this small a level to begin with.
It's the same as how all the "experts" knew viruses caused rabies, smallpox, Spanish flu, polio, etc. in the 1870-1932 time frame which was before the electron microscope was invented. Now, had they not destroyed Royal Rife's life and his dark field microscope, they would have to come to discover the truth of the matter at the tail end of this time period.