this "genital preference" debate has been going on for some time, and its only recently evolved into
genital preferences = 100% bad
why is it even a debate?
well, we have some people who can't seem to take "NO" for an answer,
and they get all psychotic and creepy when they are socially rejected.
them: hey, lets fuck!
you: no thanks, have a nice day!
them: whats the matter? you don't like me?
you: well, actually... yes!
them: why are you a hater? why do you hate me?
you: well, i don't hate you per se, I'm just not into fucking you. i'm just an ordinary straight guy! i dig women! you know, like most normal men?
them: but i am a woman!
you: but you have a dick bigger than mine!
them: oh, thats just a "girl dick"... nothing to be afraid of. want to touch it?
you: fuck no! i just told you i'm straight, didn't i? why would i want to touch your "girl dick"? i'm into "vagina", you know, like ... what real women have?
them: oh, so you have a "genital preference" do you? i guess thats somewhat understandable.
you: uh, yeah, i "prefer" vaginas, and not just a little bit. its basically a deal breaker. its not like, i "prefer" pepsi, but i will also drink coke". for me its "vagina or nothing"...
them: what if i chopped off my dick, and made it into a vagina for you?
you: no really, thats not necessary. i'm pretty sure i won't like your man-gina any more than i like your girl-dick.
them: but you just said you prefer vaginas!
you: i mean "real vaginas", not some make-shift man-hole. and i also prefer real women, because ... omg have you ever met real women!
them: but i want to be a real woman, for you! i want you to lust after me, like you lust after real women! i want you to sexually exploit me, and objectify me, like you do other women! i want you to fuck me in my front hole!
you: seriously dude, I'm really not liking the way this conversation is going. i told you i'm not interested in you, now please leave me alone.
them: you're a transphobe!
you: no, I'm just "super straight". why are you projecting your mental illnesses onto me, as I'm the mentally ill one here? why would you expect me to accept you, when you can't even accept yourself?
twitter: cancels #SuperStraight hashtag as hate speech
so the current "state of the debate" is that (trans) "women" can have penises, and (trans) "men" can get pregnant.
and since some "women" have penises, straight men just need to man up and start sucking cock.
if you wonder why the LGBT movement has done a 180 degree turn on public support ?
the LGB part are not the same at the T part, at all...
the LGB part mostly just wants to be left alone, and the same rights and benefits as anyone else...
the T part, is completely delusional, and expects everyone in the world to actively along with these delusions, and if ONE single person doesn't go along with the delusion, for example the "hateful" act of "mis-gendering"
their entire language is inverted reality. they have grown and cultivated an entire canon of literature, and language, and talking points, that all seem to be "internally consistent"
and so when anyone rejects their delusions, they feel as if they are in the right, and you are in the wrong, because their trans delusions are supported by the trans community, and your "super straight aggression" is not.
these people are quick to get violent, and they will form flash mobs, and they will try to cancel anyone who gets in their way.
this very week, the PM of Scotland is in a row over the definition of a woman, because Scotland has a "self ID law" that basically says "if a man claims to be a woman, then he is a woman"
and this definition is very important in 2023, because there is currently a man, who is a convicted serial rapist, who is in a mens prison in Scotland, and this sorry excuse for a man, has suddenly decided that he is a woman, which by Scotlands laws means he would be placed in the womens prison.
Needless to say, the women prisoners don't want this man in their prison.
So the PM gets her tit in a wringer, by implying that the status of this convict's claim to be a woman, was dependent on the type of crime committed. rape is technically defined as "insertion of the penis..." which can technically only be done by a man, in Scotland (women can be convicted of a crime similar to sodomy, which carries a similar prison sentence, but its not technically "rape")
Yes, full crazy. I think there's more to it. It might be the manifestation of a serious personality disorder.
this very week, the PM of Scotland is in a row over the definition of a woman, because Scotland has a "self ID law" that basically says "if a man claims to be a woman, then he is a woman"
Society has enabled really some abusive people by giving them a vehicle by which to circumvent rules and require that people give them undue power.
this "genital preference" debate has been going on for some time, and its only recently evolved into
genital preferences = 100% bad
why is it even a debate?
well, we have some people who can't seem to take "NO" for an answer,
and they get all psychotic and creepy when they are socially rejected.
them: hey, lets fuck!
you: no thanks, have a nice day!
them: whats the matter? you don't like me?
you: well, actually... yes!
them: why are you a hater? why do you hate me?
you: well, i don't hate you per se, I'm just not into fucking you. i'm just an ordinary straight guy! i dig women! you know, like most normal men?
them: but i am a woman!
you: but you have a dick bigger than mine!
them: oh, thats just a "girl dick"... nothing to be afraid of. want to touch it?
you: fuck no! i just told you i'm straight, didn't i? why would i want to touch your "girl dick"? i'm into "vagina", you know, like ... what real women have?
them: oh, so you have a "genital preference" do you? i guess thats somewhat understandable.
you: uh, yeah, i "prefer" vaginas, and not just a little bit. its basically a deal breaker. its not like, i "prefer" pepsi, but i will also drink coke". for me its "vagina or nothing"...
them: what if i chopped off my dick, and made it into a vagina for you?
you: no really, thats not necessary. i'm pretty sure i won't like your man-gina any more than i like your girl-dick.
them: but you just said you prefer vaginas!
you: i mean "real vaginas", not some make-shift man-hole. and i also prefer real women, because ... omg have you ever met real women!
them: but i want to be a real woman, for you! i want you to lust after me, like you lust after real women! i want you to sexually exploit me, and objectify me, like you do other women! i want you to fuck me in my front hole!
you: seriously dude, I'm really not liking the way this conversation is going. i told you i'm not interested in you, now please leave me alone.
them: you're a transphobe!
you: no, I'm just "super straight". why are you projecting your mental illnesses onto me, as I'm the mentally ill one here? why would you expect me to accept you, when you can't even accept yourself?
twitter: cancels #SuperStraight hashtag as hate speech
so the current "state of the debate" is that (trans) "women" can have penises, and (trans) "men" can get pregnant.
and since some "women" have penises, straight men just need to man up and start sucking cock.
if you wonder why the LGBT movement has done a 180 degree turn on public support ?
the LGB part are not the same at the T part, at all...
the LGB part mostly just wants to be left alone, and the same rights and benefits as anyone else...
the T part, is completely delusional, and expects everyone in the world to actively along with these delusions, and if ONE single person doesn't go along with the delusion, for example the "hateful" act of "mis-gendering"
their entire language is inverted reality. they have grown and cultivated an entire canon of literature, and language, and talking points, that all seem to be "internally consistent"
and so when anyone rejects their delusions, they feel as if they are in the right, and you are in the wrong, because their trans delusions are supported by the trans community, and your "super straight aggression" is not.
these people are quick to get violent, and they will form flash mobs, and they will try to cancel anyone who gets in their way.
this very week, the PM of Scotland is in a row over the definition of a woman, because Scotland has a "self ID law" that basically says "if a man claims to be a woman, then he is a woman"
and this definition is very important in 2023, because there is currently a man, who is a convicted serial rapist, who is in a mens prison in Scotland, and this sorry excuse for a man, has suddenly decided that he is a woman, which by Scotlands laws means he would be placed in the womens prison.
Needless to say, the women prisoners don't want this man in their prison.
So the PM gets her tit in a wringer, by implying that the status of this convict's claim to be a woman, was dependent on the type of crime committed. rape is technically defined as "insertion of the penis..." which can technically only be done by a man, in Scotland (women can be convicted of a crime similar to sodomy, which carries a similar prison sentence, but its not technically "rape")
http://twitter.com/search?q=Scotland+trans
peak clown world honk honk
Yes, full crazy. I think there's more to it. It might be the manifestation of a serious personality disorder.
Society has enabled really some abusive people by giving them a vehicle by which to circumvent rules and require that people give them undue power.