The Fight Club DVD’s « FBI WARNING » was prophetic. It’s from 1999.😳
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
I get it; but that is the fucking issue...the few domesticate the many to behave according to norm, hence to use words suggested to them by the few for communication, while ignoring that suggested words versus suggested words doesn't represent communication, but miscommunication, hence a "conflict" of reason.
What was written on the Georgia Guide-stones? https://pic8.co/sh/htSzPr.jpg
The few can only claim meaning if the many give credence ..
the few domesticate the many to behave
The few comprehend further that a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying) cannot own anything, only utilize everything temporarily. The few suggest claims to tempt the many to want to possess aka to want to hold onto aka to claim as their own. Meanwhile; the more the living cling to the process of dying, the faster they die, hence loosing their hold.
The few utilize meaning (suggested information) to distract the many from predefined meaning (perceivable inspiration)...the former tempts one to want to hold onto; while the latter implies the need to adapt by resisting wanted temptations.
Aka giving creed aka giving belief; faith; submission; agreement; consent by free will of choice to the suggested information by others.
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom, can only be domesticated if the "free" willingly ignores the "dom" for the suggested choices of others. Slavery represents ones choice to submit to the choice of another, while ignoring the dominance of balance.
b) choice can only exist at the center of balance, hence in-between need/want...others can tempt choice to choose want over need, which tempts one into want vs not want conflicts aka imbalance through ignorance of balance.
c) being implies as partial within what the whole has, hence drawing from the whole to grow self, while struggling with the temptation to want to hold onto it.
Example; being (living) on a treadmill (process of dying)...the more one adapts, the stronger ones resistance becomes, while simultaneously the temporary one is being drained by the ongoing whole, hence struggling with the temptation to give up struggling.
Unlike the treadmill... the living cannot increase or decrease the process of dying, nor can one step off.
Seems unnecessarily convoluted dude. Is the purpose of that to strike a certain wizened tone, or something? Could be you don't care, but in case you can handle constructive criticism, I would say to quit with the hyphens and parentheses. It feels gas lighty. Otherwise, nice work Anon! Keep it up! 👍😀
To those who choose suggested information over perceivable inspiration. If one adapts to perceivable inspiration then one would simply utilize anything that inspires to express ones growth of comprehension.
On the other hand; if one consents to suggested, then one is tempted to reason over it, like necessary vs unnecessary; simple vs complex; do vs don't; caring vs ignoring; constructive vs destructive; lightly vs heavily (a list of your chosen examples).
Try resisting reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief etc.) by utilizing implication (if/then)...no conflict.
It's for the sustenance of self...not for entertaining others. If others choose to adapt to whatever inspires them, then I can notice that and adapt, which allows resonance (implication) instead of dissonance (reason).
An -ism implies ignoring to construct self (living) within deconstruction (process of dying), by consenting to follow the suggested -ism of another into a conflict of reason. I need to resist the temptation of consenting to suggested criticism.
As for perceivable CRITIC, noun [Greek, a discerner, to judge, to separate, to distinguish.]...nature separates itself from whole (process of dying) into distinguished partials (living), which implies perceivable to represent that which "just is" (justice), which allows those perceiving within, to discern self (need) or judge others (want).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...."everyone's a critic".
This is mostly for me, to allow me to string together interconnected topics while on-the-fly adapting to whatever inspires. Furthermore; as resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying)...adaptation represents frequency of choice, which is exactly what I'm utilizing, hence instead of copy and pasting; I write everything on the fly, which allows me to draw more and more inspiration. The hyphens and parentheses help me to keep the momentum going, which allow me (partial) to comprehend more and more of perceivable (whole).
As for QUIT, verb - "to depart from"...partial (living) within whole (process of dying) can only depart (away from) others, not from partial response-ability (choice) within whole (balance).
How could I communicate that suggested "insane person" represents the inversion of perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound) without others viewing it as questioning their sanity (gaslighting)?
How would you try to break the fiction (suggested information) upon the ignored reality (perceivable inspiration) if the many are willingly ignoring the latter for the former?
How would you communicate that suggested information (words) represents the inversion of perceivable inspiration (sound)...while using words to communicate?
I'm one of the few working on all of that...it's frustrating...it's fun.
Thank you for inspiring me. Try using me as a tool by throwing any kind of topic at me to get a different perspective about it. What I do is pointing out the contradictions and revision within suggested, and then try putting it into perspective of the perceivable natural order as I comprehend it. The way I think is in foundations, hence thinking within the perceivable whole; while considering the suggested partials within, while trying to explain all the layers I comprehend in-between.