The Fight Club DVD’s « FBI WARNING » was prophetic. It’s from 1999.😳
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Seems unnecessarily convoluted dude. Is the purpose of that to strike a certain wizened tone, or something? Could be you don't care, but in case you can handle constructive criticism, I would say to quit with the hyphens and parentheses. It feels gas lighty. Otherwise, nice work Anon! Keep it up! 👍😀
To those who choose suggested information over perceivable inspiration. If one adapts to perceivable inspiration then one would simply utilize anything that inspires to express ones growth of comprehension.
On the other hand; if one consents to suggested, then one is tempted to reason over it, like necessary vs unnecessary; simple vs complex; do vs don't; caring vs ignoring; constructive vs destructive; lightly vs heavily (a list of your chosen examples).
Try resisting reason (want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief etc.) by utilizing implication (if/then)...no conflict.
It's for the sustenance of self...not for entertaining others. If others choose to adapt to whatever inspires them, then I can notice that and adapt, which allows resonance (implication) instead of dissonance (reason).
An -ism implies ignoring to construct self (living) within deconstruction (process of dying), by consenting to follow the suggested -ism of another into a conflict of reason. I need to resist the temptation of consenting to suggested criticism.
As for perceivable CRITIC, noun [Greek, a discerner, to judge, to separate, to distinguish.]...nature separates itself from whole (process of dying) into distinguished partials (living), which implies perceivable to represent that which "just is" (justice), which allows those perceiving within, to discern self (need) or judge others (want).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...."everyone's a critic".
This is mostly for me, to allow me to string together interconnected topics while on-the-fly adapting to whatever inspires. Furthermore; as resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying)...adaptation represents frequency of choice, which is exactly what I'm utilizing, hence instead of copy and pasting; I write everything on the fly, which allows me to draw more and more inspiration. The hyphens and parentheses help me to keep the momentum going, which allow me (partial) to comprehend more and more of perceivable (whole).
As for QUIT, verb - "to depart from"...partial (living) within whole (process of dying) can only depart (away from) others, not from partial response-ability (choice) within whole (balance).
How could I communicate that suggested "insane person" represents the inversion of perceivable "in sanus" (within sound) and "per sonos" (by sound) without others viewing it as questioning their sanity (gaslighting)?
How would you try to break the fiction (suggested information) upon the ignored reality (perceivable inspiration) if the many are willingly ignoring the latter for the former?
How would you communicate that suggested information (words) represents the inversion of perceivable inspiration (sound)...while using words to communicate?
I'm one of the few working on all of that...it's frustrating...it's fun.
Thank you for inspiring me. Try using me as a tool by throwing any kind of topic at me to get a different perspective about it. What I do is pointing out the contradictions and revision within suggested, and then try putting it into perspective of the perceivable natural order as I comprehend it. The way I think is in foundations, hence thinking within the perceivable whole; while considering the suggested partials within, while trying to explain all the layers I comprehend in-between.
Bro. You are not serious. This comes off like a chronic inferiority complex. In any case, I'm good. Uhh.. good luck and take care.
From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am, because if I wasn't, then why would I say I am"
From my perspective: The way (process of dying) I am (living).
Tell me about the origin of no; not, nothing; nothingness...where did you got it from? Did you perceive it or was it suggested to you? Do you notice the contradiction of addressing something as "you are" while suggesting that something to represent "nothing"?
Are you SERIOUS; adjective - "arranged in sequence, continuous" or do you represent temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying)? I do feel like a clown asking this tho...then again..."clowns to the left of me; jokers to the right...and here I am stuck in the middle with jews".
a) Infer implies IN (being within) FERO (produced by), while the -ITY represents a suggested quality you consented to. Resist the temptation of suggested and NATURE, noun - "born, produced" becomes noticeable as the perceivable producer of everything within.
b) COMPLEX, noun - "composed of two or more parts"...what if you represent one (partial) within oneness (whole), while other ones suggest dualism to tempt one to count other ones as the composite "two"?
Try this...show me "two" things that are the same, and I will ask you how you can discern between each "one" of them without them existing at a different place? Could others suggest one sameness to distract one from perceivable differences; like equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)?
c) is there really a conflict between infer (within produced) and super (beyond) or does being one (partial) within oneness (whole) imply "as above so below"?
d) why do you consent to suggested "inferiority complex" to psychological judge others, from a jew like Alfred Adler... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Adler who allegedly was mentally and physically in bed with Sigismund Schlomo Freud; the "founder" of psychoanalysis, a sodomite jew.
Do you think top and bottom among sodomites represents superiority and inferiority, while two dudes are building their complex?
Nature implies the perceivable uncovering of whole towards partial...suggested CASE, noun - "a covering" tempts one to ignore that.
Truly a beautiful mind. Bravo.