And why are the faces blurred, that would help me determine their age better unless more details are provided other than an account creating potential clickbait.

If they are underage, by law, they have to be blurred.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-46-protection-identity-child-witnesses-and-victims

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3509, the term "child" means a person who is under the age of eighteen who is or is alleged to be a victim of a crime of physical abuse, sexual abuse, or exploitation; or a witness to a crime committed against another person. Section 3509(d) requires that all government employees connected with "a criminal proceeding," all court personnel, the defendant and all employees of the defendant, and all members of the jury: keep all documents that disclose the name or any other information concerning a child in a secure place to which no person who does not have reason to know their contents has access; and disclose documents described (in the statute) or the information in them that concerns a child only to persons who, by reason of their participation in the proceeding, have reason to know such information.

This is also used against the children, mind you. By withholding their identity, they prevent any protections of the child by outside sources. In other words, if a judge is corrupt they can prevent word of a rape from getting out under the pretenses of "protecting the child's identity", let it pass the statute of limitations, and then toss the case.

Public schools also play by these rules to hide the vast number of sexual assault, rape, and molestation cases that occur. If there's no victim, because "we can't disclose their identity", then there's no crime.

All swept right under the rug.

Look who posted this. President Trump himself. Do you believe he would post something like this without knowing for certain if it was true or not? First of all he would leave himself open to lawsuits and second it would destroy his credibility.

So merely with the evidence that Trump posted this I am certain that it is DeSantis and it is underage girls and there was alcohol involved.

Sauce.

Note: online liberal rag. Maybe that's relelvant, or not. But the sources referred to are an anonymous "Whistleblower", aka "a source with close knowledge of the matter".

https://hillreporter.com/exclusive-pic-ron-desantis-accused-of-attending-drinking-party-with-students-at-high-school-where-he-taught-115220

So...it's not true unless it's on MSM?