The real problem is the IRS likes to stick the FBI on people when IRS tactics don't work. So yes, one must be prepared for a battle royale. I have beat them multiple times and have previously taken measures to shield assets after discovering much of the IRS unconstitutional organization and actions.
But the FBI is also unconstitutional for many of the same reasons as noted above, so they would be wise to be cautious when targeting people knowledgeable in Constitutional Law that are smart enough to stay out of Federal Lands, where they have no Constitutional jurisdiction.
Many of the J6 prisoners got tricked by their lawyers to come back to DC. They never should have done that.
Also, accountants are trained to follow IRS rules and procedures. They do not know Constitutional Law, and they are not interested in showing that all IRS rules and procedures are unconstitutional because Constitutional Law supercedes all. So basically lawyers, accountants, and IRS agents team up to gangfuck anybody that challenges them. That is why ProSe Constitutional action is most effective, and most feared by both IRS and FBI.
"Many of the J6 prisoners got tricked by their lawyers to come back to DC. They never should have done that."
do you happen to have any examples or a state citizen avoiding federal land and thus avoiding the FBI's clutches? they do raids on non-federal land, albeit maybe unconstitutionally, so what would stop them from arresting and transporting J6ers from their homes do you think even if the J6ers new the constitution and told the agents their presence was illegal?
You are likely correct. They may have come after them, but no reason to make it easy for them. Better to challenge jurisdiction, imo. When dealing with an unconstitutional Nazi organization, you can't really stop them from doing whatever they decide to do, but by voluntarily going into their jurisdiction, it is considered "consent to be prosecuted for any 'crimes' committed in that jurisdiction", imo, even if the 'crimes' are fabricated.
Best to never sign anything or ever give any verbal consent to anything when dealing with Feds since in most cases your signature or verbal consent are the only thing that gives them any jurisdiction, ever. This applies especially to those being held in jail, but uncharged.
Per due process violation of 5th Amendment, they should all be countersuing DOJ lawyers and Merrick Garland individually in Federal District Court civilly for "color of law violation" 42 USC 1983 and then immediately after file criminal charges for violations of 18 USC 241/242 AND 18 USC 2384 (prison time for each count). Then follow that up with Crimes Against Humanity violation charges and demand execution of all Defendants (DOJ lawyers and AG). Time to stop fucking around and time to start "legally" executing people, imo.
The real problem is the IRS likes to stick the FBI on people when IRS tactics don't work. So yes, one must be prepared for a battle royale. I have beat them multiple times and have previously taken measures to shield assets after discovering much of the IRS unconstitutional organization and actions.
But the FBI is also unconstitutional for many of the same reasons as noted above, so they would be wise to be cautious when targeting people knowledgeable in Constitutional Law that are smart enough to stay out of Federal Lands, where they have no Constitutional jurisdiction.
Many of the J6 prisoners got tricked by their lawyers to come back to DC. They never should have done that.
Also, accountants are trained to follow IRS rules and procedures. They do not know Constitutional Law, and they are not interested in showing that all IRS rules and procedures are unconstitutional because Constitutional Law supercedes all. So basically lawyers, accountants, and IRS agents team up to gangfuck anybody that challenges them. That is why ProSe Constitutional action is most effective, and most feared by both IRS and FBI.
very interesting thought/theory/fact:
"Many of the J6 prisoners got tricked by their lawyers to come back to DC. They never should have done that."
do you happen to have any examples or a state citizen avoiding federal land and thus avoiding the FBI's clutches? they do raids on non-federal land, albeit maybe unconstitutionally, so what would stop them from arresting and transporting J6ers from their homes do you think even if the J6ers new the constitution and told the agents their presence was illegal?
You are likely correct. They may have come after them, but no reason to make it easy for them. Better to challenge jurisdiction, imo. When dealing with an unconstitutional Nazi organization, you can't really stop them from doing whatever they decide to do, but by voluntarily going into their jurisdiction, it is considered "consent to be prosecuted for any 'crimes' committed in that jurisdiction", imo, even if the 'crimes' are fabricated.
Best to never sign anything or ever give any verbal consent to anything when dealing with Feds since in most cases your signature or verbal consent are the only thing that gives them any jurisdiction, ever. This applies especially to those being held in jail, but uncharged.
Per due process violation of 5th Amendment, they should all be countersuing DOJ lawyers and Merrick Garland individually in Federal District Court civilly for "color of law violation" 42 USC 1983 and then immediately after file criminal charges for violations of 18 USC 241/242 AND 18 USC 2384 (prison time for each count). Then follow that up with Crimes Against Humanity violation charges and demand execution of all Defendants (DOJ lawyers and AG). Time to stop fucking around and time to start "legally" executing people, imo.