Agreed, and your point is strong. I do not disagree at all. Tesla discovered resonance about 100 years ago, probably by now, the military has perfected its use/abuse.
I think the bridge you're referring to is the millennium bridge, and yes it was resonance that required its reinforcement.
I do think that reinforces the argument, but, we need to explain a lot of other things, like, how the beam is powered, focused, how it's not detectable in the ionosphere, not detectable in the target country, and how it produces earthquakes many kilometers down in the Earth. This is just all too much to assume to allow it to just pass like it's a known fact or something.
Yes, your outer level point is correct and strong. We must be careful when making a statement or point of discussion. We should be able to defend our arguments with facts not fiction. MY favorite saying is "Facts are our Friends."
If facts are your friends then you HAVE to accept them even if it disproves your point and you are shown to be wrong. Resonance can indeed take down a mighty structure such as a bridge built by man with ease.
But how much mass does even the largest structure ever made by humans have? I have no idea but I do know that it is multiple orders of magnitude less than the mass of a tectonic plate. If you combined all the energy created in the entire world by human beings, it would not do shit to the plate that slid around in Turkey that cause the earthquake.
We have to be willing to admit to ourselves and more importantly, the enemy when we are wrong. Because if we just keep coming up with more twisted bullshit that is only based in made up words, fantasy, and actual words that we do not know jack shit about, then we are just as bad as them because that is lying. Lying to ourselves, our loved ones, and the people we want to redpill.
We should not try to do magic we do not understand.
Whilst we're at it, we should probably be looking at ground focused energy devices if there's any legs on the resonance theory.
I can imagine a build up of a directed energy wave reflecting off different layers of the mantle etc. eventually leading to a shift in the plates, causing earthquakes.
However, to think that such an effect could be targeted accurately is science-fantasy land. We can't even adequately predict the weather ffs.
Agreed, and your point is strong. I do not disagree at all. Tesla discovered resonance about 100 years ago, probably by now, the military has perfected its use/abuse.
I think the bridge you're referring to is the millennium bridge, and yes it was resonance that required its reinforcement.
I do think that reinforces the argument, but, we need to explain a lot of other things, like, how the beam is powered, focused, how it's not detectable in the ionosphere, not detectable in the target country, and how it produces earthquakes many kilometers down in the Earth. This is just all too much to assume to allow it to just pass like it's a known fact or something.
Yes, your outer level point is correct and strong. We must be careful when making a statement or point of discussion. We should be able to defend our arguments with facts not fiction. MY favorite saying is "Facts are our Friends."
If facts are your friends then you HAVE to accept them even if it disproves your point and you are shown to be wrong. Resonance can indeed take down a mighty structure such as a bridge built by man with ease.
But how much mass does even the largest structure ever made by humans have? I have no idea but I do know that it is multiple orders of magnitude less than the mass of a tectonic plate. If you combined all the energy created in the entire world by human beings, it would not do shit to the plate that slid around in Turkey that cause the earthquake.
We have to be willing to admit to ourselves and more importantly, the enemy when we are wrong. Because if we just keep coming up with more twisted bullshit that is only based in made up words, fantasy, and actual words that we do not know jack shit about, then we are just as bad as them because that is lying. Lying to ourselves, our loved ones, and the people we want to redpill.
We should not try to do magic we do not understand.
Whilst we're at it, we should probably be looking at ground focused energy devices if there's any legs on the resonance theory.
I can imagine a build up of a directed energy wave reflecting off different layers of the mantle etc. eventually leading to a shift in the plates, causing earthquakes.
However, to think that such an effect could be targeted accurately is science-fantasy land. We can't even adequately predict the weather ffs.