The main point I like to make is that to generate an earthquake that released as much energy as a Tsar Bomb, you dont have to input energy equivalent to this.
Think about a very tall jenga tower. You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
I find that theory quite believable.
For correct question is "is it possible to have a technology that could be used to trigger earthquakes, are certain areas under certain conditions ?"
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
The answer to that would be "I cannot imagine why such a technology is not possible"
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, I am not buying it.
You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
Yes, but, wait—the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction. For the entire life of the building, it stores its own destructive energy from the moment of its construction. The act of deconstructing a critical support is only the act of releasing the kinetic energy that was invested, say, 40 years earlier.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
Yes! I want to see more lab work demonstrated on this.
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
Whatever it is, from a legal standpoint, using this technology on another country is an act of war, plain and simple, and, if this technology spreads and propagates, it will be used by other countries against us. But, that's not happened because, frankly, no one yet can satisfy what I'm saying about the energy budget, here.
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
You didn't call an earthquake, tho. Not trying to split hairs unfairly on you, tho, but, that's a bit long of a stretch as far as predictions go. If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, you must explain it to a higher level of resolution than merely predicting "something" happening as a "false flag." There are more steps, here, and they need to be explained, at least to a level where the "jump" from one assumption to the next makes plausible scientific sense. At the moment, it does not.
the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction
Correct, but the construction does not need to happen right now. It might be a structure formed over years. For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
Whatever it is, from a legal standpoint, using this technology on another country is an act of war, plain and simple, and, if this technology spreads and propagates, it will be used by other countries against us
These technologies, if they exist, it would not be one country using against another. It would be the Cabal using it against any country whose leaders go strongly against them, and they dont have alternate means to control them. I do think they use elections, popular uprisings, sanctions, financial crimes etc, before resorting to weaponised weather.
You didn't call an earthquake,
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
Yes! I want to see more lab work demonstrated on this.
No one here can either prove that such tech is available nor disprove that such a technology is impossible. All we are doing is thinking about possibilities.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
Um, that's not how nukes work (I literally am an expert) but, I see what you're saying, you're saying that conventional explosives impact the core nucleus to achieve critical mass, OK, sure, but
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
With no disrespect intended, anyone that reads the link you just posted and assumes that is an idiot. No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
The main point I like to make is that to generate an earthquake that released as much energy as a Tsar Bomb, you dont have to input energy equivalent to this.
Think about a very tall jenga tower. You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
I find that theory quite believable.
For correct question is "is it possible to have a technology that could be used to trigger earthquakes, are certain areas under certain conditions ?"
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
The answer to that would be "I cannot imagine why such a technology is not possible"
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, I am not buying it.
Yes, but, wait—the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction. For the entire life of the building, it stores its own destructive energy from the moment of its construction. The act of deconstructing a critical support is only the act of releasing the kinetic energy that was invested, say, 40 years earlier.
Yes! I want to see more lab work demonstrated on this.
Whatever it is, from a legal standpoint, using this technology on another country is an act of war, plain and simple, and, if this technology spreads and propagates, it will be used by other countries against us. But, that's not happened because, frankly, no one yet can satisfy what I'm saying about the energy budget, here.
You didn't call an earthquake, tho. Not trying to split hairs unfairly on you, tho, but, that's a bit long of a stretch as far as predictions go. If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, you must explain it to a higher level of resolution than merely predicting "something" happening as a "false flag." There are more steps, here, and they need to be explained, at least to a level where the "jump" from one assumption to the next makes plausible scientific sense. At the moment, it does not.
Correct, but the construction does not need to happen right now. It might be a structure formed over years. For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
These technologies, if they exist, it would not be one country using against another. It would be the Cabal using it against any country whose leaders go strongly against them, and they dont have alternate means to control them. I do think they use elections, popular uprisings, sanctions, financial crimes etc, before resorting to weaponised weather.
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
No one here can either prove that such tech is available nor disprove that such a technology is impossible. All we are doing is thinking about possibilities.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
Um, that's not how nukes work (I literally am an expert) but, I see what you're saying, you're saying that conventional explosives impact the core nucleus to achieve critical mass, OK, sure, but
With no disrespect intended, anyone that reads the link you just posted and assumes that is an idiot. No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
That's precisely how nuclear bombs work. :(