the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction
Correct, but the construction does not need to happen right now. It might be a structure formed over years. For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
Whatever it is, from a legal standpoint, using this technology on another country is an act of war, plain and simple, and, if this technology spreads and propagates, it will be used by other countries against us
These technologies, if they exist, it would not be one country using against another. It would be the Cabal using it against any country whose leaders go strongly against them, and they dont have alternate means to control them. I do think they use elections, popular uprisings, sanctions, financial crimes etc, before resorting to weaponised weather.
You didn't call an earthquake,
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
Yes! I want to see more lab work demonstrated on this.
No one here can either prove that such tech is available nor disprove that such a technology is impossible. All we are doing is thinking about possibilities.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
Um, that's not how nukes work (I literally am an expert) but, I see what you're saying, you're saying that conventional explosives impact the core nucleus to achieve critical mass, OK, sure, but
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
With no disrespect intended, anyone that reads the link you just posted and assumes that is an idiot. No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
100% eh? I don't think any human being can ever believe/disbelieve anything with 100% certainty, because we have no way of knowing the nature of our Universe.
Some nuclear weapon designs do use a conventional charge to compress an atomic mass into a smaller space so that it will go prompt critical. So they're not really wrong.
No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
I am not sure what the confusion here is. I only predicted a false flag. I never claimed to predict an earthquake. I am point out the coincidence between the prediction of a false flag and observation of an earth quake.
Correct, but the construction does not need to happen right now. It might be a structure formed over years. For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
These technologies, if they exist, it would not be one country using against another. It would be the Cabal using it against any country whose leaders go strongly against them, and they dont have alternate means to control them. I do think they use elections, popular uprisings, sanctions, financial crimes etc, before resorting to weaponised weather.
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
No one here can either prove that such tech is available nor disprove that such a technology is impossible. All we are doing is thinking about possibilities.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
Um, that's not how nukes work (I literally am an expert) but, I see what you're saying, you're saying that conventional explosives impact the core nucleus to achieve critical mass, OK, sure, but
With no disrespect intended, anyone that reads the link you just posted and assumes that is an idiot. No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
That's precisely how nuclear bombs work. :(
100% eh? I don't think any human being can ever believe/disbelieve anything with 100% certainty, because we have no way of knowing the nature of our Universe.
Some nuclear weapon designs do use a conventional charge to compress an atomic mass into a smaller space so that it will go prompt critical. So they're not really wrong.
I am not sure what the confusion here is. I only predicted a false flag. I never claimed to predict an earthquake. I am point out the coincidence between the prediction of a false flag and observation of an earth quake.
e=mc²
Bollocks. There is more than one sort of mass, how many do you want?
Working in a patents office is a gift for plagiarists.
Amen.
The original interwebs...
f=ma
E = I x R