The main point I like to make is that to generate an earthquake that released as much energy as a Tsar Bomb, you dont have to input energy equivalent to this.
Think about a very tall jenga tower. You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
I find that theory quite believable.
For correct question is "is it possible to have a technology that could be used to trigger earthquakes, are certain areas under certain conditions ?"
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
The answer to that would be "I cannot imagine why such a technology is not possible"
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, I am not buying it.
1st Law of Thermodynamics: you have to get the energy from somewhere. It doesn't come from nothing. The cases of resonant structural failure result from a continuous input of power, adding up to the energy necessary to trigger the collapse. It doesn't happen until you get to the breaking point.
But pay attention to the balance. The jenga tower has energy put into it by its construction (gravitational potential energy).
The "vibrations can do anything" line of thinking is no theory. It is magical thinking. They can do a lot, in certain circumstances, but they are not magic.
Every earthquake is a coincidence. There were earthquakes before there was technology. So also, volcanic eruptions.
It did a pretty convincing magic trick to make lots of people disappear instantly though. However, they never came back, so not sure that counts as a 'trick'.
Every radioactive decay is a coincidence. The entire world is filled with them. Even inside your body. The existence of random events entails the occurrence of coincidences, with mathematical certainty.
You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
Yes, but, wait—the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction. For the entire life of the building, it stores its own destructive energy from the moment of its construction. The act of deconstructing a critical support is only the act of releasing the kinetic energy that was invested, say, 40 years earlier.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
Yes! I want to see more lab work demonstrated on this.
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
Whatever it is, from a legal standpoint, using this technology on another country is an act of war, plain and simple, and, if this technology spreads and propagates, it will be used by other countries against us. But, that's not happened because, frankly, no one yet can satisfy what I'm saying about the energy budget, here.
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
You didn't call an earthquake, tho. Not trying to split hairs unfairly on you, tho, but, that's a bit long of a stretch as far as predictions go. If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, you must explain it to a higher level of resolution than merely predicting "something" happening as a "false flag." There are more steps, here, and they need to be explained, at least to a level where the "jump" from one assumption to the next makes plausible scientific sense. At the moment, it does not.
I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to get at here scientifically. The earth's crust is always under tremendous stress. Each point is being gravitationally attracted to the center, the pressure from lower layers is holding it up, and it is being pulled on by the moon and other bodies. If you can simply relax the pressure some how in a small area, you can tap tremendous amounts of energy as the forces readjust to a new equilibrium. You don't need to feed the system with the amount of energy you get out.
So we, i.e. humans, don't need to input that energy. Earthquakes merely release the energy that is stored from all kinds of gravitational energy sources that have been present for eons. All we need to do is provide the activation energy. After that it is fully exothermic. It's like saying a toddler can't fire a gun because he didn't create the bullet. All he needs is enough strength to pull the trigger. The potential energy for the devastation is already present in the environment.
the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction
Correct, but the construction does not need to happen right now. It might be a structure formed over years. For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
Whatever it is, from a legal standpoint, using this technology on another country is an act of war, plain and simple, and, if this technology spreads and propagates, it will be used by other countries against us
These technologies, if they exist, it would not be one country using against another. It would be the Cabal using it against any country whose leaders go strongly against them, and they dont have alternate means to control them. I do think they use elections, popular uprisings, sanctions, financial crimes etc, before resorting to weaponised weather.
You didn't call an earthquake,
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
Yes! I want to see more lab work demonstrated on this.
No one here can either prove that such tech is available nor disprove that such a technology is impossible. All we are doing is thinking about possibilities.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
Um, that's not how nukes work (I literally am an expert) but, I see what you're saying, you're saying that conventional explosives impact the core nucleus to achieve critical mass, OK, sure, but
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
With no disrespect intended, anyone that reads the link you just posted and assumes that is an idiot. No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
100% eh? I don't think any human being can ever believe/disbelieve anything with 100% certainty, because we have no way of knowing the nature of our Universe.
Some nuclear weapon designs do use a conventional charge to compress an atomic mass into a smaller space so that it will go prompt critical. So they're not really wrong.
No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
I am not sure what the confusion here is. I only predicted a false flag. I never claimed to predict an earthquake. I am point out the coincidence between the prediction of a false flag and observation of an earth quake.
Yes, but, wait—the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction.
frankly, no one yet can satisfy what I'm saying about the energy budget, here.
These are at odds. The energy required is implicit in your first statement. The energy of the earthquake is already there in the construction of the planet. This energy is further added to from the sun which heats it up and keeps that battery we call "the core" spinning. The system has as close enough to an infinite energy store as makes no nevermind (at least on the scales we are talking about).
Why did you think Turkey? Because of NATO? I find it very interesting coincidence crude oil price is about to blow up and Turkey´s stock market is at its peak but someone already sold.
Erdogan is yet another "quantum operative" - is he good, is he bad, is he on the Cabal side, is he against? No one can tell.
Turkey and Japan are two long time countries outwardly doing the Globalist bidding, but going against them secretly.
NATO is I think the tipping point for Turkey and it reached 2 weeks ago where they made it very clear they are not going along.
I think the tipping point for Japan is getting here, even as we speak, and something terrible is in store for them. I will be bold enough to predict a huge earth quake hitting them is one of the possibilities. It could even be a devastating volcano. Or a nuclear disaster, tsunami - anything.
He's not a mystery at all. He's a Turkish Islamist. He makes no secret of being a dictator, being expansionist with regards to Syria, his desire to expand NATO, his disdain for Christians who don't submit to Islam. He doesn't like wokeness. He supports "immigration" jihad and sees exporting his population to Germany as part of that effort. He maintains the NATO alliance for historical and geopolitical reasons. It is better not to make enemies unnecessarily, especially if they're nominally your allies. Because he's a Turk, he doesn't quite get along with the Arabs in the Islamic world, but they find agreement on things like Israel, the EU, the US, and China more often than not.
He's a dictator who's not afraid to wield power, which we saw by him absolutely crushing the 10,000-man coup d'etat some while back. Many were executed in the purge that followed. And despite the economic distress his country is seeing now, his country views him as a strong leader with a favorable vision for his country and they're backing him even as inflation rises.
Erdogan isn't much of a mystery to any clear thinking person. He might be to a Leftist who seem perpetually baffled at the possibility that people could disagree with their "sainted" opinions, but not to folks who frequent this site.
The main point I like to make is that to generate an earthquake that released as much energy as a Tsar Bomb, you dont have to input energy equivalent to this.
Think about a very tall jenga tower. You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
This really resonates with me! [Ha! That was an awesomely awful pun there.]
I agree wholeheartedly with this possibility. Is Turkey located in a seismically active zone? Were there already forces building along the tectonic plates in that region? If so, just one little low-energy nudge (a la the tumbling tower block analogy) could have resulted in a significantly higher energy output.
All in all, the whole chain of event feels a bit too coincidental to me. And I know we tend to give coincidences a well-earned stink eye here. At the very least, I think this timeline of events needs further investigation.
The main point I like to make is that to generate an earthquake that released as much energy as a Tsar Bomb, you dont have to input energy equivalent to this.
Think about a very tall jenga tower. You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
I find that theory quite believable.
For correct question is "is it possible to have a technology that could be used to trigger earthquakes, are certain areas under certain conditions ?"
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
The answer to that would be "I cannot imagine why such a technology is not possible"
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, I am not buying it.
1st Law of Thermodynamics: you have to get the energy from somewhere. It doesn't come from nothing. The cases of resonant structural failure result from a continuous input of power, adding up to the energy necessary to trigger the collapse. It doesn't happen until you get to the breaking point.
But pay attention to the balance. The jenga tower has energy put into it by its construction (gravitational potential energy).
The "vibrations can do anything" line of thinking is no theory. It is magical thinking. They can do a lot, in certain circumstances, but they are not magic.
Every earthquake is a coincidence. There were earthquakes before there was technology. So also, volcanic eruptions.
Yeah this is the most logical way to view it. E=mc^2, it isn’t magic.
It did a pretty convincing magic trick to make lots of people disappear instantly though. However, they never came back, so not sure that counts as a 'trick'.
</bad_taste>
There are no coincidences.
Every radioactive decay is a coincidence. The entire world is filled with them. Even inside your body. The existence of random events entails the occurrence of coincidences, with mathematical certainty.
You are just here to shut debate, shut it down by insulting all who you don't want to speak.
I see you.
Yes, but, wait—the laws of conservation of energy state that the energy needed to destroy a tower was first spent in its construction. For the entire life of the building, it stores its own destructive energy from the moment of its construction. The act of deconstructing a critical support is only the act of releasing the kinetic energy that was invested, say, 40 years earlier.
Yes! I want to see more lab work demonstrated on this.
Whatever it is, from a legal standpoint, using this technology on another country is an act of war, plain and simple, and, if this technology spreads and propagates, it will be used by other countries against us. But, that's not happened because, frankly, no one yet can satisfy what I'm saying about the energy budget, here.
You didn't call an earthquake, tho. Not trying to split hairs unfairly on you, tho, but, that's a bit long of a stretch as far as predictions go. If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, you must explain it to a higher level of resolution than merely predicting "something" happening as a "false flag." There are more steps, here, and they need to be explained, at least to a level where the "jump" from one assumption to the next makes plausible scientific sense. At the moment, it does not.
I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to get at here scientifically. The earth's crust is always under tremendous stress. Each point is being gravitationally attracted to the center, the pressure from lower layers is holding it up, and it is being pulled on by the moon and other bodies. If you can simply relax the pressure some how in a small area, you can tap tremendous amounts of energy as the forces readjust to a new equilibrium. You don't need to feed the system with the amount of energy you get out.
So we, i.e. humans, don't need to input that energy. Earthquakes merely release the energy that is stored from all kinds of gravitational energy sources that have been present for eons. All we need to do is provide the activation energy. After that it is fully exothermic. It's like saying a toddler can't fire a gun because he didn't create the bullet. All he needs is enough strength to pull the trigger. The potential energy for the devastation is already present in the environment.
Correct, but the construction does not need to happen right now. It might be a structure formed over years. For example, an atomic bomb can set off huge amount of energy by being triggered by a small conventional bomb to set off the chain reaction. The energy being set off was already present in the material long before.
These technologies, if they exist, it would not be one country using against another. It would be the Cabal using it against any country whose leaders go strongly against them, and they dont have alternate means to control them. I do think they use elections, popular uprisings, sanctions, financial crimes etc, before resorting to weaponised weather.
I didn't. My point is, a false flag in Turkey was visible miles away for anyone watching what was going on. And exactly at that point they are hit with an earthquake. It should at least raise our "no coincidences" red flags.
No one here can either prove that such tech is available nor disprove that such a technology is impossible. All we are doing is thinking about possibilities.
My point is that, it is very hard to deny that possibility.
Um, that's not how nukes work (I literally am an expert) but, I see what you're saying, you're saying that conventional explosives impact the core nucleus to achieve critical mass, OK, sure, but
With no disrespect intended, anyone that reads the link you just posted and assumes that is an idiot. No, you absolutely did not mention earthquake at all.
My point is that it is 100% scienfic folly to assume that possibility.
That's precisely how nuclear bombs work. :(
100% eh? I don't think any human being can ever believe/disbelieve anything with 100% certainty, because we have no way of knowing the nature of our Universe.
Some nuclear weapon designs do use a conventional charge to compress an atomic mass into a smaller space so that it will go prompt critical. So they're not really wrong.
I am not sure what the confusion here is. I only predicted a false flag. I never claimed to predict an earthquake. I am point out the coincidence between the prediction of a false flag and observation of an earth quake.
e=mc²
Bollocks. There is more than one sort of mass, how many do you want?
Working in a patents office is a gift for plagiarists.
f=ma
These are at odds. The energy required is implicit in your first statement. The energy of the earthquake is already there in the construction of the planet. This energy is further added to from the sun which heats it up and keeps that battery we call "the core" spinning. The system has as close enough to an infinite energy store as makes no nevermind (at least on the scales we are talking about).
https://yewtu.be/channel/UCDlTlFdpcElvHsjH-b6ieBA
https://yewtu.be/channel/UCsELkVA5QDltjjIHyL7mWYQ
https://yewtu.be/channel/UCvHqXK_Hz79tjqRosK4tWYA
Tip of the iceberg...
This was interesting and was posted recently on the vibration effects like strings being plucked at certain frequencies and for certain durations.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aA4OUP9L/how-haarp-changes-the-earths-fre/c/
Why did you think Turkey? Because of NATO? I find it very interesting coincidence crude oil price is about to blow up and Turkey´s stock market is at its peak but someone already sold.
Erdogan is yet another "quantum operative" - is he good, is he bad, is he on the Cabal side, is he against? No one can tell.
Turkey and Japan are two long time countries outwardly doing the Globalist bidding, but going against them secretly.
NATO is I think the tipping point for Turkey and it reached 2 weeks ago where they made it very clear they are not going along.
I think the tipping point for Japan is getting here, even as we speak, and something terrible is in store for them. I will be bold enough to predict a huge earth quake hitting them is one of the possibilities. It could even be a devastating volcano. Or a nuclear disaster, tsunami - anything.
He's not a mystery at all. He's a Turkish Islamist. He makes no secret of being a dictator, being expansionist with regards to Syria, his desire to expand NATO, his disdain for Christians who don't submit to Islam. He doesn't like wokeness. He supports "immigration" jihad and sees exporting his population to Germany as part of that effort. He maintains the NATO alliance for historical and geopolitical reasons. It is better not to make enemies unnecessarily, especially if they're nominally your allies. Because he's a Turk, he doesn't quite get along with the Arabs in the Islamic world, but they find agreement on things like Israel, the EU, the US, and China more often than not.
He's a dictator who's not afraid to wield power, which we saw by him absolutely crushing the 10,000-man coup d'etat some while back. Many were executed in the purge that followed. And despite the economic distress his country is seeing now, his country views him as a strong leader with a favorable vision for his country and they're backing him even as inflation rises.
Erdogan isn't much of a mystery to any clear thinking person. He might be to a Leftist who seem perpetually baffled at the possibility that people could disagree with their "sainted" opinions, but not to folks who frequent this site.
Pretty much what we all thought about Putin, Xi, Kim etc. So.
This really resonates with me! [Ha! That was an awesomely awful pun there.]
I agree wholeheartedly with this possibility. Is Turkey located in a seismically active zone? Were there already forces building along the tectonic plates in that region? If so, just one little low-energy nudge (a la the tumbling tower block analogy) could have resulted in a significantly higher energy output.
All in all, the whole chain of event feels a bit too coincidental to me. And I know we tend to give coincidences a well-earned stink eye here. At the very least, I think this timeline of events needs further investigation.