Why create unnecessary resistance to a truth with your word choice though? Why not be more precise is your verbiage? I like calling them JINOs. It fosters conversation, reduces knee jerk reactions, and bypasses the “antisemitism” verbal gambit. “No. These guys only say they’re Jews to deflect criticism.” “No I’m not antisemitic. I have no problem with Jews. I have a problem with Satanists/Communists/Zionists/Etc, who only say they’re Jews to avoid criticism.”
Why dig in your heels in the name of your truth when you can be so much more persuasive with a minor course correction?
Why create unnecessary resistance to a truth with your word choice though? Why not be more precise is your verbiage? I like calling them JINOs. It fosters conversation, reduces knee jerk reactions, and bypasses the “antisemitism” verbal gambit. “No. These guys only say they’re Jews to deflect criticism.” “No I’m not antisemitic. I have no problem with Jews. I have a problem with Satanists/Communists/Zionists/Etc, who only say they’re Jews to avoid criticism.”
Why dig in your heels in the name of your truth when you can be so much more persuasive with a minor course correction?
Chess, not checkers.
Would you mind explaining what you mean by that a bit more for me?