Because old history did not have the logging technologies as we do now.
How you record history matters does it not?
When I took history in high school.
Our teacher sent 5 people in the hall.
He called one person in to tell them a small story.
Then he told them to call another person in and tell th them the same story.
We repeated the process until the last person.
He told us.
Do you see how much the story has changed once the original source was passed down from person to person?
He was teaching us to understand that most old history has been altered so much. That we have to be careful when committing to any historical point of view.
Yes of course it changes. But we don't have the original story to tell us "how" it changed. In your example, the teacher gave the original story, so we have a baseline.
So in the argument you and the other dude were having, you both were drawing on something that could be incorrect, or a half truth, or even 100% true.
But the further back we go, the less we know for sure .
That's the nature of passing information to different people.
Human beings interpret information based on experiences.
This will naturally leave out details on its own,
Science proves that our brain naturally deletes information as we bring in new data. This is because of the amount of data our brain has to process at once.
It cannot process everything at once. So it will automatically delete data.
Common sense tells you I am correct.
Because old history did not have the logging technologies as we do now.
How you record history matters does it not?
When I took history in high school.
Our teacher sent 5 people in the hall.
He called one person in to tell them a small story.
Then he told them to call another person in and tell th them the same story.
We repeated the process until the last person.
He told us.
Do you see how much the story has changed once the original source was passed down from person to person?
He was teaching us to understand that most old history has been altered so much. That we have to be careful when committing to any historical point of view.
Yes of course it changes. But we don't have the original story to tell us "how" it changed. In your example, the teacher gave the original story, so we have a baseline.
So in the argument you and the other dude were having, you both were drawing on something that could be incorrect, or a half truth, or even 100% true.
But the further back we go, the less we know for sure .
So when I said cabal history.
We only have versions that they have controlled that is good for them.
You proved my point.
We don’t have the original story to begin with.
We have the altered future versions of history. Which is missing important details to our perspectives.
Well you assume it's altered
You just proved my point.
It is altered.
That's the nature of passing information to different people.
Human beings interpret information based on experiences. This will naturally leave out details on its own,
Science proves that our brain naturally deletes information as we bring in new data. This is because of the amount of data our brain has to process at once.
It cannot process everything at once. So it will automatically delete data.