Your chart does show an increase in tropical storm activity, but that alone does not establish why this increase is occurring. Any model attempting to explain this trend must be able to provide a mechanism for why it’s happening and an objectively falsifiable prediction for future cyclonic activity. Does the “it’s secret govt tech” model provide such a mechanism or predictions?

If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content here would get removed.

Good, that would open up more room for things that we actually have facts and evidence for, like vaccine side effects and election rigging.

some things may not be objectively true but they feel right and that’s what’s important.

False, feelings do not substantiate anything. Feelings are incredibly subjective and have no bearing on reality. This exact argument is what the Left uses to justify their nonsense: “it feels right/good, therefore it must be right/good”. Ultimately this is the same argument that Flat Earthers use as well; all their arguments boil down to “I don’t like NASA and my model feels right, regardless of what evidence opposes it”.

Intuition is not a bad tool to use, but it cannot be your only tool. If there’s no evidence to support your intuition, or available evidence contradicts it, then your intuition needs to be re-examined.