Turkey opposes allowing Sweden and Finland into NATO, refuses bribes, and now, randomly, there is a massive earthquake.
The DS has been able to control the weather for decades now (HAARP, cloud seeding, etc). Notice how suddenly, it's getting warmer? The storms and events the left "predicted" are all coming true, and even the skeptics are starting to go along with everything? Obviously, it's because they're making it happen. If you've ever wondered why wind mills are still running on calm days, it's because they're not harnessing the wind, they're creating it. Now there are thousands of them, right beneath our noses.
President Trump knows all this, which is why he is opposing wind farms. The MSM doesn't understand it, but we know.
Too many people are buying into it, and I haven't seen any legitimate statisticians debunking the official narrative. I think the DS first tried misinformation, but for a while, there was a lot of scientific articles about how climate change wasn't real. Then suddenly, it started happened just as they predicted and they're trying to make us look like idiots for doubting it. Some sophisticated Sun Tzu tactics being played here.
Anything that happens "suddenly" in climate is simply not "climate." It is weather. In the long run, nothing is going on. There was a "hiatus" of nearly 20 years, so they had to abandon the "global warming" narrative for the "climate change" narrative. But there has been no or little change on that front. And if you look at data earlier than 1970, you can find lots of worse / extreme weather.
We just got through an ice storm here in Texas, so no, I’m not seeing the general climate getting warmer. Didn’t Trump Jr post on TS about how Mt Washington just hit record cold temps? I’ve also recently heard that the polar ice caps are growing to the utter bafflement of climate scientists.
The storms and events the Left “predicted” are all coming true.
Do you have any data to suggest that storms are getting worse or more frequent? Any data showing that said increase is man made? What are these other events you allude to?
Weather manipulation tech is not nearly as advanced as some think. At best they can make clouds drop their rain a little earlier than usual, and at best they get a 15% increase in rainfall per Scientific American. To make the leap that they can cause hurricanes and earthquakes is completely unfounded.
Turkey gets an earthquake after disagreeing with its NATO allies? That’s called correlation; it is not a valid data point. You have to prove that earthquakes are artificial. Do you even have a scientifically plausible mechanism for how earthquakes can be artificially induced? Furthermore, if the Turkey earthquakes were generated by other NATO members, then Turkey would consider that an act of war, split from NATO, and immediately side with Russia.
Vague speculation about DS capabilities, when it’s backed by conjecture and not verifiable facts, is not helpful. This kind of irrational speculation is why we keep getting inundated with Flat Earthers and NESARA scammers.
Here's a good example. Larger, more violent hurricanes are becoming more frequent. There are years where it spikes, but the trend overall is going up. If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content around here would get removed. Somethings may not be objectively true, but they feel right and that's what's important.
If the DS did have control over the whether, they would use it subtly, sparingly. Anyone who tried to call them out on it would sound crazy, which is exactly their point.
Your chart does show an increase in tropical storm activity, but that alone does not establish why this increase is occurring. Any model attempting to explain this trend must be able to provide a mechanism for why it’s happening and an objectively falsifiable prediction for future cyclonic activity. Does the “it’s secret govt tech” model provide such a mechanism or predictions?
If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content here would get removed.
Good, that would open up more room for things that we actually have facts and evidence for, like vaccine side effects and election rigging.
some things may not be objectively true but they feel right and that’s what’s important.
False, feelings do not substantiate anything. Feelings are incredibly subjective and have no bearing on reality. This exact argument is what the Left uses to justify their nonsense: “it feels right/good, therefore it must be right/good”. Ultimately this is the same argument that Flat Earthers use as well; all their arguments boil down to “I don’t like NASA and my model feels right, regardless of what evidence opposes it”.
Intuition is not a bad tool to use, but it cannot be your only tool. If there’s no evidence to support your intuition, or available evidence contradicts it, then your intuition needs to be re-examined.
There is another explanation. Earth and universe in general have events happening in cyclical manner (think thousands of years) and everything can be "predicted". And cabal use it for their needs.
Turkey opposes allowing Sweden and Finland into NATO, refuses bribes, and now, randomly, there is a massive earthquake.
The DS has been able to control the weather for decades now (HAARP, cloud seeding, etc). Notice how suddenly, it's getting warmer? The storms and events the left "predicted" are all coming true, and even the skeptics are starting to go along with everything? Obviously, it's because they're making it happen. If you've ever wondered why wind mills are still running on calm days, it's because they're not harnessing the wind, they're creating it. Now there are thousands of them, right beneath our noses.
President Trump knows all this, which is why he is opposing wind farms. The MSM doesn't understand it, but we know.
Is it getting warmer? Temperatures have swung well within the normal averages with some colder days and hotter days here for the past 25 years+
Global temp peaked 8 years ago and has been decreasing (slowly) since then.
According to the NOAA, the 10 hottest years on record have all happened within the last 20 years, 2016 being the hottest.
We've already seen the likes of NASA revise records to suit the warming narrative, so anything from a .gov on this front is automatically suspect.
We also know, and have known, that the sun is in a hot cycle.
Yes, that's what "peaked" means: what you said does not contact what I said. It reached a high point, and then started to decrease from there.
Too many people are buying into it, and I haven't seen any legitimate statisticians debunking the official narrative. I think the DS first tried misinformation, but for a while, there was a lot of scientific articles about how climate change wasn't real. Then suddenly, it started happened just as they predicted and they're trying to make us look like idiots for doubting it. Some sophisticated Sun Tzu tactics being played here.
Anything that happens "suddenly" in climate is simply not "climate." It is weather. In the long run, nothing is going on. There was a "hiatus" of nearly 20 years, so they had to abandon the "global warming" narrative for the "climate change" narrative. But there has been no or little change on that front. And if you look at data earlier than 1970, you can find lots of worse / extreme weather.
We just got through an ice storm here in Texas, so no, I’m not seeing the general climate getting warmer. Didn’t Trump Jr post on TS about how Mt Washington just hit record cold temps? I’ve also recently heard that the polar ice caps are growing to the utter bafflement of climate scientists.
Do you have any data to suggest that storms are getting worse or more frequent? Any data showing that said increase is man made? What are these other events you allude to?
Weather manipulation tech is not nearly as advanced as some think. At best they can make clouds drop their rain a little earlier than usual, and at best they get a 15% increase in rainfall per Scientific American. To make the leap that they can cause hurricanes and earthquakes is completely unfounded.
Turkey gets an earthquake after disagreeing with its NATO allies? That’s called correlation; it is not a valid data point. You have to prove that earthquakes are artificial. Do you even have a scientifically plausible mechanism for how earthquakes can be artificially induced? Furthermore, if the Turkey earthquakes were generated by other NATO members, then Turkey would consider that an act of war, split from NATO, and immediately side with Russia.
Vague speculation about DS capabilities, when it’s backed by conjecture and not verifiable facts, is not helpful. This kind of irrational speculation is why we keep getting inundated with Flat Earthers and NESARA scammers.
Here's a good example. Larger, more violent hurricanes are becoming more frequent. There are years where it spikes, but the trend overall is going up. If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content around here would get removed. Somethings may not be objectively true, but they feel right and that's what's important.
If the DS did have control over the whether, they would use it subtly, sparingly. Anyone who tried to call them out on it would sound crazy, which is exactly their point.
Your chart does show an increase in tropical storm activity, but that alone does not establish why this increase is occurring. Any model attempting to explain this trend must be able to provide a mechanism for why it’s happening and an objectively falsifiable prediction for future cyclonic activity. Does the “it’s secret govt tech” model provide such a mechanism or predictions?
Good, that would open up more room for things that we actually have facts and evidence for, like vaccine side effects and election rigging.
False, feelings do not substantiate anything. Feelings are incredibly subjective and have no bearing on reality. This exact argument is what the Left uses to justify their nonsense: “it feels right/good, therefore it must be right/good”. Ultimately this is the same argument that Flat Earthers use as well; all their arguments boil down to “I don’t like NASA and my model feels right, regardless of what evidence opposes it”.
Intuition is not a bad tool to use, but it cannot be your only tool. If there’s no evidence to support your intuition, or available evidence contradicts it, then your intuition needs to be re-examined.
I thought the wind was caused by all the trees waving at each other...
Only when it's a friendly wave
There is another explanation. Earth and universe in general have events happening in cyclical manner (think thousands of years) and everything can be "predicted". And cabal use it for their needs.
That's not an attack! That's climate change!