HOW are we still explaining why Trump recommended the vax to people? If you're still failing this basic IQ test this far along in the game, maybe you should just log off and never come back!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧠 These people are stupid!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
It wasn't IQ-type intelligence that was being tested; I know a number of people who are seriously smart -- programmers, scientists, etc -- who took the vaccine, probably because they were focused on their work and had been working and living socially within a narrow slice of the Establishment for decades. Some (like Steve Kirsch) figured things out afterward and have become vocal truth-tellers regarding the jab, some haven't.
Common sense can be -- and was -- subverted though. Even if you don't trust one aspect, if you trusted one other -- any other -- you ended up on the losing end.
If you trusted any "experts", any "scientists", any "medical journals", any government entity or agency, any media, etc. then it was likely that, with billions used to fund the propaganda, many would fall for it.
They didn't see most of the same things we saw. They were subjected to negative doom porn day in, day out and rapidly broken down mentally and physically by it.
But I will continue to be vocal against this divisiveness: Right in the side bar is this line:
Yet we stupidly allow ourselves to be divided by vax status. Just playing their games in the end.
But it was though. IQ, more than anything, is about pattern recognition. Those of us who refused the clot shot recognized patterns that our brain told us 'this is bad juju'.
I won't argue with that; pattern recognition is a big part of intelligence. My point was that people with high inherent intelligence can be blinded by a narrow focus (including by things like neurosis, which is literally a partial denial of reality), which, yes, makes them overall less intelligent -- often in the the area we'd call common sense, but in other ways as well.
You also see this often in professional people when they are talking about things outside of their own field; super-smart in engineering maybe, but not more than average smart anywhere else.