That is NOT what I said. You are twisting my words. I never said "I know you are wrong," nor did I imply that I knew that to be true. I said explicitly that the evidence suggests. That is not me "knowing," that is me seeing substantial evidence that supports a different position.
Whatever the Truth is, Is what It Is. I don't know it, I don't profess to know it, but I can follow evidence, and I can see when a conclusion doesn't fit with the evidence. That has nothing to do with "knowing truth," that is simply how the act of reason works. ANYONE using logic, based on the same premises comes to the same conclusion. That is what logic is. It is not mutable. Logic is not truth however, logic is just a self-consistent language. The conclusion relies on the premises. If the premises are shown false, or premises are missing from the logical construction, the conclusion is also false. To test premises or determine if you are missing something important you must be willing to look at the evidence in earnest.
If you can learn to appreciate the depth of the difference between "knowing" and "the evidence suggests," perhaps you can better appreciate the evidence itself.
Why bother sharing if you have no way to know if any of it is true?
How can you know that anything is True? The Truth is Whatever it is. The best we can do is investigate the evidence and see where it leads. We can only do that if we look in earnest at all of the evidence.
If you release the need to believe that you know the truth, you can engage in honest investigation. Once you "know" it, you lose that capacity.
You made a lot of matter of fact statements for someone who doesn't know or trust anything.
I tried very hard to qualify my statements as "the evidence suggests." This means it was my assessment of the evidence I have seen. The "statements of fact" were just that, facts. Facts are not "truth," they are reports of events. I showed you the teenciest, tiniest bit of evidence, just to see what would happen. You didn't even engage with it in the slightest. There is so much more evidence to support my assertions if you were genuinely interested in seeing it.
If I thought for one second you would dig in yourself, taking on the investigation in earnest, I would bring certain other pieces to your attention. You aren't.
People who are "awakened" are always amazed that so few see "the obvious truth" of the corruption in [insert evil entity here]. The reason people don't see is because they refuse to look in earnest. If they look at all (which they generally don't), they only look to justify their current beliefs, never digging deeper than the surface where they can explain it away. If they can't explain it away they dismiss it as "irrelevant" or "obvious lies."
This is how the world remains in slavery, and how all the worlds fuckery actually happens, by our desire to hold on to "what we know to be true." That desire is exploited to maintain control.
But you know for sure I'm wrong? Genius. Good luck out there.
That is NOT what I said. You are twisting my words. I never said "I know you are wrong," nor did I imply that I knew that to be true. I said explicitly that the evidence suggests. That is not me "knowing," that is me seeing substantial evidence that supports a different position.
Whatever the Truth is, Is what It Is. I don't know it, I don't profess to know it, but I can follow evidence, and I can see when a conclusion doesn't fit with the evidence. That has nothing to do with "knowing truth," that is simply how the act of reason works. ANYONE using logic, based on the same premises comes to the same conclusion. That is what logic is. It is not mutable. Logic is not truth however, logic is just a self-consistent language. The conclusion relies on the premises. If the premises are shown false, or premises are missing from the logical construction, the conclusion is also false. To test premises or determine if you are missing something important you must be willing to look at the evidence in earnest.
If you can learn to appreciate the depth of the difference between "knowing" and "the evidence suggests," perhaps you can better appreciate the evidence itself.
Why bother sharing if you have no way to know if any of it is true? Who do you think you are fooling?
You made a lot of matter of fact statements for someone who doesn't know or trust anything.
Spare me the word salads, Mr. Know Nothing.
How can you know that anything is True? The Truth is Whatever it is. The best we can do is investigate the evidence and see where it leads. We can only do that if we look in earnest at all of the evidence.
If you release the need to believe that you know the truth, you can engage in honest investigation. Once you "know" it, you lose that capacity.
I tried very hard to qualify my statements as "the evidence suggests." This means it was my assessment of the evidence I have seen. The "statements of fact" were just that, facts. Facts are not "truth," they are reports of events. I showed you the teenciest, tiniest bit of evidence, just to see what would happen. You didn't even engage with it in the slightest. There is so much more evidence to support my assertions if you were genuinely interested in seeing it.
If I thought for one second you would dig in yourself, taking on the investigation in earnest, I would bring certain other pieces to your attention. You aren't.
People who are "awakened" are always amazed that so few see "the obvious truth" of the corruption in [insert evil entity here]. The reason people don't see is because they refuse to look in earnest. If they look at all (which they generally don't), they only look to justify their current beliefs, never digging deeper than the surface where they can explain it away. If they can't explain it away they dismiss it as "irrelevant" or "obvious lies."
This is how the world remains in slavery, and how all the worlds fuckery actually happens, by our desire to hold on to "what we know to be true." That desire is exploited to maintain control.
We remain in slavery by rejecting Jesus Christ and His Church.