Why bother sharing if you have no way to know if any of it is true?
How can you know that anything is True? The Truth is Whatever it is. The best we can do is investigate the evidence and see where it leads. We can only do that if we look in earnest at all of the evidence.
If you release the need to believe that you know the truth, you can engage in honest investigation. Once you "know" it, you lose that capacity.
You made a lot of matter of fact statements for someone who doesn't know or trust anything.
I tried very hard to qualify my statements as "the evidence suggests." This means it was my assessment of the evidence I have seen. The "statements of fact" were just that, facts. Facts are not "truth," they are reports of events. I showed you the teenciest, tiniest bit of evidence, just to see what would happen. You didn't even engage with it in the slightest. There is so much more evidence to support my assertions if you were genuinely interested in seeing it.
If I thought for one second you would dig in yourself, taking on the investigation in earnest, I would bring certain other pieces to your attention. You aren't.
People who are "awakened" are always amazed that so few see "the obvious truth" of the corruption in [insert evil entity here]. The reason people don't see is because they refuse to look in earnest. If they look at all (which they generally don't), they only look to justify their current beliefs, never digging deeper than the surface where they can explain it away. If they can't explain it away they dismiss it as "irrelevant" or "obvious lies."
This is how the world remains in slavery, and how all the worlds fuckery actually happens, by our desire to hold on to "what we know to be true." That desire is exploited to maintain control.
I don't think that is reasonably contestable. There are examples literally everywhere. It's basically the definition of the word "propaganda:" the creation of belief to exploit a population.
Believing something is true doesn't make it true.
I don't think that is reasonably contestable either. Every single person on this planet believes something is true that you do not. The vast majority believe many, many things that fall into that category. Either they are wrong, you are wrong, or everyone is wrong. Those are the only options.
People's beliefs have been exploited to keep them in slavery.
See any act of recognized slavery, and how the masters have created and retained the belief within the minds of all of their slaves that they are owned. You can't hold on to a slave that recognizes their self-agency. What slave owners do to people who reject their mastery and can't be broken (beliefs changed) is kill them. Those people die, but they die free.
A person can only be truly enslaved by their own choice, even if they don't realize they are making that choice.
A person can (in general) always choose to die, thus there is always a way out, there is always a choice, even if both options suck. Choice means self-agency. Slavery means no self-agency, thus slavery is always a choice (and doesn't really exist except as a state of mind).
There may be exceptions to "always a choice" (MKUltra e.g.), but in general, I assert this as a reasonable premise.
It is possible that people could believe that they are free, but they are not. The belief that they are slaves (a necessary belief by premise 4) is hiding from their own awareness, locked deep within their minds; within contradicting beliefs that they don't really think about as contradictions (or think about at all).
This assertion is probably not something that most people would agree with, but the evidence for this assertion abounds. If you would like examples, look outside.
If we assume that these premises are true, is it possible that people believe that they are free, when they actually live in slavery, because they know that they are free? In other words, is it possible that the box that contains them and enslaves them is a function of their belief that they are free, coupled with the unseen but conflicting beliefs that enforce that false belief of freedom?
If so, then exploiting that belief, that "knowledge," and encouraging such a set of beliefs that create the opposite of the truth would be the reason people are enslaved. In other words, if people did not have the belief that they are free, they would no longer be slaves, or at least would have the opportunity to break free by rejecting the belief and thus their Masters.
This outline is a restatement of my last sentence, the sentence you are protesting in your response.
I do not mind being a slave to Jesus. I put my faith in Him and His Church which He promised the gates of hell would not prevail against.
You and your country will become a slave to the Jews (you are already, look at your Federal Reserve) if you reject Jesus and His Church. In your attempts to shake slavery, you reject the one way out. I'm sorry you can't turn that corner.
You aren't going to listen to me and I won't listen to you because, as you said, you know nothing.
Jesus knew what He was talking about. He also rose from the dead. I'm going to take His word over yours. When is the last time you rose from the dead and got the Jews to come after you?
When is the last time the power structure came after you?
You and your country will become a slave to the Jews (you are already
I am not a slave to anyone. I have chosen not to be. It really is that simple. I am well aware of the actions of the Jews (or rather, those very few people that sit at the top of the rest of the Jewish people). Their actions have been behind everything. What YOU don't appreciate, and don't seem to want to even indulge as possible, is that the Catholic Church (and all other Abrahamic religions) were started by those same Jews, specifically to control the world. It is the actions of those same Jews that I am trying to help you see. The fuckery just goes back further than you realize.
In your attempts to shake slavery, you reject the one way out.
You are incorrect. I mean, you can believe that if you want, and that's fair, but your belief doesn't make it true. My investigation has shown me that I have chosen to live in slavery prior to a few years ago and my own personal revelation. This revelation occurred after I realized I had not previously investigated honestly, but rather with biases I didn't know I had. My original investigations into "reality" were based from a situation very similar to your current stance. Since that revelation I have chosen to not live in slavery.
The freedom I feel, that I experience, the recognition of my own agency and my responsibility for that agency is unbelievable in its power. Thus, your belief that I am a slave because I do not believe exactly the same as you believe is not warranted by how I feel. Am I delusional? Sure, maybe. Maybe the feeling of complete freedom that I have is totally delusional, but it is so incredibly empowering, idgaf.
Jesus knew what He was talking about.
I agree with this statement. However, if you haven't read all of the Gospels, including all of the ones left out of the Bible, I suggest you have no fucking clue what Jesus was really saying. The Jews (their agents) left out some really important things, and shoved in their Old Testament, on purpose, to completely screw with the belief systems, and drive a false Christian religion down the throats of those who would follow Jesus' teachings. They took a profundity, and brutalized it so that they could control society.
The evidence suggests that the same Jews that you seem to despise (again, a very small group of them at the top of the food chain) are the people that created your beliefs and your Church. They purposefully left out really important context to create that control system. That is what I was trying to show you.
You aren't going to listen to me
I have listened to everything you have said. Every word has been important to me. I can't possibly provide a reasonable response if I don't listen. I don't think you are on the right path simply because from what I have seen you have not looked in earnest at all of the evidence. Me not believing what you believe doesn't mean I haven't listened. Thinking that it does, I suggest, doesn't appreciate what it means to listen, and cogitate, and respond after listening.
I'm going to take His word over yours
Jesus has said nothing contradictory to what I am saying. On the contrary, his words completely corroborate mine. You just won't find all the important ones in "The Bible."
Spare me the word salads.
This suggests to me that you do not understood what it means to listen. I have spoken in earnest. When you are ready to listen in earnest, perhaps we can have a more meaningful conversation. I look forward to that day, if it ever comes.
How can you know that anything is True? The Truth is Whatever it is. The best we can do is investigate the evidence and see where it leads. We can only do that if we look in earnest at all of the evidence.
If you release the need to believe that you know the truth, you can engage in honest investigation. Once you "know" it, you lose that capacity.
I tried very hard to qualify my statements as "the evidence suggests." This means it was my assessment of the evidence I have seen. The "statements of fact" were just that, facts. Facts are not "truth," they are reports of events. I showed you the teenciest, tiniest bit of evidence, just to see what would happen. You didn't even engage with it in the slightest. There is so much more evidence to support my assertions if you were genuinely interested in seeing it.
If I thought for one second you would dig in yourself, taking on the investigation in earnest, I would bring certain other pieces to your attention. You aren't.
People who are "awakened" are always amazed that so few see "the obvious truth" of the corruption in [insert evil entity here]. The reason people don't see is because they refuse to look in earnest. If they look at all (which they generally don't), they only look to justify their current beliefs, never digging deeper than the surface where they can explain it away. If they can't explain it away they dismiss it as "irrelevant" or "obvious lies."
This is how the world remains in slavery, and how all the worlds fuckery actually happens, by our desire to hold on to "what we know to be true." That desire is exploited to maintain control.
We remain in slavery by rejecting Jesus Christ and His Church.
I don't think that is reasonably contestable. There are examples literally everywhere. It's basically the definition of the word "propaganda:" the creation of belief to exploit a population.
I don't think that is reasonably contestable either. Every single person on this planet believes something is true that you do not. The vast majority believe many, many things that fall into that category. Either they are wrong, you are wrong, or everyone is wrong. Those are the only options.
See any act of recognized slavery, and how the masters have created and retained the belief within the minds of all of their slaves that they are owned. You can't hold on to a slave that recognizes their self-agency. What slave owners do to people who reject their mastery and can't be broken (beliefs changed) is kill them. Those people die, but they die free.
A person can (in general) always choose to die, thus there is always a way out, there is always a choice, even if both options suck. Choice means self-agency. Slavery means no self-agency, thus slavery is always a choice (and doesn't really exist except as a state of mind).
There may be exceptions to "always a choice" (MKUltra e.g.), but in general, I assert this as a reasonable premise.
This assertion is probably not something that most people would agree with, but the evidence for this assertion abounds. If you would like examples, look outside.
If we assume that these premises are true, is it possible that people believe that they are free, when they actually live in slavery, because they know that they are free? In other words, is it possible that the box that contains them and enslaves them is a function of their belief that they are free, coupled with the unseen but conflicting beliefs that enforce that false belief of freedom?
If so, then exploiting that belief, that "knowledge," and encouraging such a set of beliefs that create the opposite of the truth would be the reason people are enslaved. In other words, if people did not have the belief that they are free, they would no longer be slaves, or at least would have the opportunity to break free by rejecting the belief and thus their Masters.
This outline is a restatement of my last sentence, the sentence you are protesting in your response.
I do not mind being a slave to Jesus. I put my faith in Him and His Church which He promised the gates of hell would not prevail against.
You and your country will become a slave to the Jews (you are already, look at your Federal Reserve) if you reject Jesus and His Church. In your attempts to shake slavery, you reject the one way out. I'm sorry you can't turn that corner.
You aren't going to listen to me and I won't listen to you because, as you said, you know nothing.
Jesus knew what He was talking about. He also rose from the dead. I'm going to take His word over yours. When is the last time you rose from the dead and got the Jews to come after you?
When is the last time the power structure came after you?
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/253600/fbi-retracts-leaked-document-orchestrating-investigation-of-catholics
We're over the target. They have no need to bother you because you're happily dazed and confused.
Enjoy being Kushner's slave. I hope you'll reconsider. Spare me the word salads. What I've told you is all there is.
I am not a slave to anyone. I have chosen not to be. It really is that simple. I am well aware of the actions of the Jews (or rather, those very few people that sit at the top of the rest of the Jewish people). Their actions have been behind everything. What YOU don't appreciate, and don't seem to want to even indulge as possible, is that the Catholic Church (and all other Abrahamic religions) were started by those same Jews, specifically to control the world. It is the actions of those same Jews that I am trying to help you see. The fuckery just goes back further than you realize.
You are incorrect. I mean, you can believe that if you want, and that's fair, but your belief doesn't make it true. My investigation has shown me that I have chosen to live in slavery prior to a few years ago and my own personal revelation. This revelation occurred after I realized I had not previously investigated honestly, but rather with biases I didn't know I had. My original investigations into "reality" were based from a situation very similar to your current stance. Since that revelation I have chosen to not live in slavery.
The freedom I feel, that I experience, the recognition of my own agency and my responsibility for that agency is unbelievable in its power. Thus, your belief that I am a slave because I do not believe exactly the same as you believe is not warranted by how I feel. Am I delusional? Sure, maybe. Maybe the feeling of complete freedom that I have is totally delusional, but it is so incredibly empowering, idgaf.
I agree with this statement. However, if you haven't read all of the Gospels, including all of the ones left out of the Bible, I suggest you have no fucking clue what Jesus was really saying. The Jews (their agents) left out some really important things, and shoved in their Old Testament, on purpose, to completely screw with the belief systems, and drive a false Christian religion down the throats of those who would follow Jesus' teachings. They took a profundity, and brutalized it so that they could control society.
The evidence suggests that the same Jews that you seem to despise (again, a very small group of them at the top of the food chain) are the people that created your beliefs and your Church. They purposefully left out really important context to create that control system. That is what I was trying to show you.
I have listened to everything you have said. Every word has been important to me. I can't possibly provide a reasonable response if I don't listen. I don't think you are on the right path simply because from what I have seen you have not looked in earnest at all of the evidence. Me not believing what you believe doesn't mean I haven't listened. Thinking that it does, I suggest, doesn't appreciate what it means to listen, and cogitate, and respond after listening.
Jesus has said nothing contradictory to what I am saying. On the contrary, his words completely corroborate mine. You just won't find all the important ones in "The Bible."
This suggests to me that you do not understood what it means to listen. I have spoken in earnest. When you are ready to listen in earnest, perhaps we can have a more meaningful conversation. I look forward to that day, if it ever comes.