Here's an example. Let's take teachers. They have a curriculum. That's what they teach. Who controls the curriculum? And now imagine the people who push that think they're doing something positive. Because the "studies" have set these so called factual parameters as a jump off point.
I'm other words, they assume at the very base of everything the foundation is proven and reliable.
But what if the foundation is itself completely fabricated?
Drs-they practice what they learn. Are drs out to murder people, by and large? No, the foundation of modern medicine gives them parameters to study and practice within because the foundation is beyond reproach.
But what if it's all incorrect?
What if viruses are complete bullshit? There's ample proof that at the very least it's a questionable theory.
I think about this dilemma all the time.
We have to think about parameters.
Here's an example. Let's take teachers. They have a curriculum. That's what they teach. Who controls the curriculum? And now imagine the people who push that think they're doing something positive. Because the "studies" have set these so called factual parameters as a jump off point.
I'm other words, they assume at the very base of everything the foundation is proven and reliable.
But what if the foundation is itself completely fabricated?
Drs-they practice what they learn. Are drs out to murder people, by and large? No, the foundation of modern medicine gives them parameters to study and practice within because the foundation is beyond reproach.
But what if it's all incorrect?
What if viruses are complete bullshit? There's ample proof that at the very least it's a questionable theory.