Don’t think we have to worry about him becoming a full time lawyer. Might as well be Lloyd Christmas writing their suits.
I’ve done enough yapping about what a joke this case is. You can search my post history if you’re so inclined. It is embarrassing that anyone thinks this case is going anywhere. No cognizable/intelligible/viable legal theory exists in their complaint. Only a bunch of jabbering about many of the egregious acts of bullshit that happened in the 2020 election.
If you are not legally inclined, you read that spiel that is basically 90% of their complaint and think that is their argument. You quit reading too soon. The last few pages are their claims for relief. Idiocy of the highest order. They have six of them:
promissory estoppel - trying to tie the 2020 election to a contract law form of equitable relief. Basically trying to claim people whom he never met or spoke to somehow have an agreement with him that they backed out of. Nope. Dead on arrival.
promissory estoppel - same as above
breach of duty - similar angle to 1 & 2 but trying to tie negligence theory to people he never met or spoke to, nor can he vote for. Elected officials do not have a “duty of care” to the public, the breach of which arises a viable negligence claim. Nope. Dead on arrival
intentional infliction of emotional distress - L. O. Fucking L. Wow. He went there. The retard level is self explanatory here.
fraud - not fraud as in the election was fraudulent. Fraud as in “fraud in the inducement.” Like “these guys told me they would uphold election law, and they didn’t.” But to be viable, would require “I wouldn’t have ever cast a ballot if I knew otherwise” to be considered fraud in the inducement. WTF? Nope. Dead on arrival.
civil conspiracy - no viable underlying tortious acts were alleged, accordingly no conspiracy is possible. Dead on arrival.
And these fucking dipshits of the highest order actually state that a federal criminal statute that defines punishment for treason is a basis to grant him this same punishment as relief in a damn civil case…
People send these dickheads money. Grift grift grift, all day long…grift grift grift while I sing this song…Jim Bob Cooter Brunson and company are snake hopium salesmen capitalizing on people’s righteous outrage and indignation about the fraudulent 2020 election. Pay these clowns no heed and definitely send $0 to them.
What counter arguments? There are none. Other than "omg you cannot criticize this sacred cow!" That is about the extent of it. A bunch of platitudes about muh fraud and muh treason doesn't count as a legit argument. This case is retarded stupid dog shit and people should be better than to let their own feelings about the 2020 election cloud the analysis. Yes, 2020 was ultra mega fraud. No, making a bullshit lawsuit cloaking outrage about the fraud in with random tort claims is still not viable even if people are mad.
This case is so bad, you cannot make a counter argument that I couldn't immediately destroy. Thats how bad this is. Me. Just this rando on the internet can eviscerate any argument in favor of the viability of this lawsuit. Stop listening to anyone promoting it. Anyone who is shilling this case on their podcast is in the same class as Lloyd Christmas Brunson & Co. - grifters.
Don’t think we have to worry about him becoming a full time lawyer. Might as well be Lloyd Christmas writing their suits.
I’ve done enough yapping about what a joke this case is. You can search my post history if you’re so inclined. It is embarrassing that anyone thinks this case is going anywhere. No cognizable/intelligible/viable legal theory exists in their complaint. Only a bunch of jabbering about many of the egregious acts of bullshit that happened in the 2020 election.
If you are not legally inclined, you read that spiel that is basically 90% of their complaint and think that is their argument. You quit reading too soon. The last few pages are their claims for relief. Idiocy of the highest order. They have six of them:
promissory estoppel - trying to tie the 2020 election to a contract law form of equitable relief. Basically trying to claim people whom he never met or spoke to somehow have an agreement with him that they backed out of. Nope. Dead on arrival.
promissory estoppel - same as above
breach of duty - similar angle to 1 & 2 but trying to tie negligence theory to people he never met or spoke to, nor can he vote for. Elected officials do not have a “duty of care” to the public, the breach of which arises a viable negligence claim. Nope. Dead on arrival
intentional infliction of emotional distress - L. O. Fucking L. Wow. He went there. The retard level is self explanatory here.
fraud - not fraud as in the election was fraudulent. Fraud as in “fraud in the inducement.” Like “these guys told me they would uphold election law, and they didn’t.” But to be viable, would require “I wouldn’t have ever cast a ballot if I knew otherwise” to be considered fraud in the inducement. WTF? Nope. Dead on arrival.
civil conspiracy - no viable underlying tortious acts were alleged, accordingly no conspiracy is possible. Dead on arrival.
And these fucking dipshits of the highest order actually state that a federal criminal statute that defines punishment for treason is a basis to grant him this same punishment as relief in a damn civil case…
People send these dickheads money. Grift grift grift, all day long…grift grift grift while I sing this song…Jim Bob Cooter Brunson and company are snake hopium salesmen capitalizing on people’s righteous outrage and indignation about the fraudulent 2020 election. Pay these clowns no heed and definitely send $0 to them.
I think you aren’t as smart as you think you are.
Just read the counter arguments that have been written already by others.
What counter arguments? There are none. Other than "omg you cannot criticize this sacred cow!" That is about the extent of it. A bunch of platitudes about muh fraud and muh treason doesn't count as a legit argument. This case is retarded stupid dog shit and people should be better than to let their own feelings about the 2020 election cloud the analysis. Yes, 2020 was ultra mega fraud. No, making a bullshit lawsuit cloaking outrage about the fraud in with random tort claims is still not viable even if people are mad.
This case is so bad, you cannot make a counter argument that I couldn't immediately destroy. Thats how bad this is. Me. Just this rando on the internet can eviscerate any argument in favor of the viability of this lawsuit. Stop listening to anyone promoting it. Anyone who is shilling this case on their podcast is in the same class as Lloyd Christmas Brunson & Co. - grifters.
I don't think I am smart. That's how retarded this case is. But your brilliant counter to this point was noted. Are you a MENSA member?