The Occult History of the Third Reich
🧠 MEMORY HOLE 🕳️
An audio recording of this had been played in one of the Bill Cooper episodes that Ashland Dog posted a couple of months ago. Here's that thread: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXQrMoPx/300-bill-cooper-hour-of-the-time/c/
I found the video of it on archive.org.
https://archive.org/details/TheOccultHistoryOfTheThirdReich-Part4HimmlerTheMystic
It should be required viewing since it connects the root ideology of Nazism with the religion of the global cabal. Q had confirmed Hitler was just a puppet. The ideology shared between him and the puppet masters was the occult.
This forum is much, much bigger than Q, so, yes, GAW is "my thing."
Furthermore, do you really want a forum populated with "yes men," who will agree with everything Q says, or you do? What you don't realize is that you NEED people like me, people who understand history, and are capable of thinking outside the box. People like me, who are conservative-minded, can provide a perspective you are lacking.
It seems what you want to see on GAW is an echo chamber. That helps no one.
There are just some debates that are not productive by the time you get to this forum. Debating whether Q is trustworthy would seem more fitting for the chans or something.
I'd like to see what the counter evidence was to #940. Was the year wrong or was the logo fake?
in #940, Q implied that Nazis were communists, and analogous to Antifa.
Q was correct, and the comparison of Nazis to communists has been a credible view within political science for many years. The book Liberal Fascism is based on this argument. Fascism and communism are ideological cousins that are authoritarian, socialist, and expansionistic. The main difference is that communism relies on the state to control the means of production, while fascism relies on state corporatism to control it. We see this today in the Chinese Communist Party, which has technically turned China into a fascist state.
The father of fascism was Benito Mussolini, who was a self-declared socialist until the day he died. Hitler's problem with the communist party wasn't ideological, it's that they were rivals.
What Q was also hinting at in #940 was that the Antifaschistische was ultimately controlled by the same puppet masters as the Nazis, and that Antifa uses the same street thug tactics as the Nazi Brownshirts. Antifa is a George Soros creation, and Soros is a descendant of the Nazi Legacy.
So I'd say Q was 100% correct in #940.
Since you are convinced of your perception of this, I won't debate you, but there is plenty to dispute what you write. The only source materials claiming that the Nazis were "puppets" are those who build upon fringe theories, along with the "Nazis were monsters" agenda. Legitimate historical sources do not suggest anything matching these theories. Beware that most source material is written by Zionists, who will say anything they can to demonize Germany and throw suspicion off themselves.
What I will say, is that the only "claim" about Soros' roots is Soros himself. There is no verification elsewhere that children were employed as Soros claims. If you take a suspicious position of his claim, it could be that this story of his has two aims: First, it adds to the belief that the "Nazis" were monsters and victimized Jews. Second, it hides/obfuscates the true source of his seed capital.
“ What you don't realize is that you NEED people like me, people who understand history, and are capable of thinking outside the box.”
That’s awfully presumptuous to assume you’re the only one on GAW who understands history and are capable of thinking outside the box. Besides, you only understand the history you were taught. And “history” is determined by the victorious in every conflict throughout history.
First of all, I said, "...people like me." I said nothing of the kind that I am the only one on GAW who thinks that way. Don't put words in my mouth.
Secondly, I came here to GAW thinking incorrectly about history, and it was folks here who led me to sources which chronicled the truth about history. I was open-minded, and benefited from others here on the forum. What is needed here is a bit of humility...and I have already demonstrated my own humility, by a willingness to listen to others.
And finally, the fact that others attack people here on this forum for expressing an "opinion" is reprehensible. That's what the left does. We are supposed to welcome discussions, no?
“ We are supposed to welcome discussions, no?”
Agreed!