Distributed for conference. Just so we're aware.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
Distributed for conference. Just so we're aware.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
"Distributed for conference" is a term used in the context of the United States Supreme Court to indicate that a case has been scheduled for consideration by the Court at a private conference.
When a case is "distributed for conference," it means that the Justices of the Supreme Court will review the case and discuss it amongst themselves to decide whether or not to hear the case on its merits. During the conference, each Justice will have the opportunity to share their views on the case and to ask questions of their colleagues.
After the conference, the Justices will vote on whether to grant or deny review of the case. If four or more Justices vote to grant review, the case will proceed to full briefing and argument before the Court.
Thank you
Sadly it will go like this: "This case again... We can't hold THEM accountable for not doing thier job to investigate clear election irregularities. Next..."
since you seem to know, 4 will grant review but how many will it take to rule in favor if review is granted? Only 5 or all 9?
A majority of five justices is all that they need.
bingo! So if it get's heard it's got a got chance of passing