"The question is, what happens after that? What happens when Russia takes considerable ground in Ukraine despite hundreds of billions of dollars in NATO aid, advanced armaments, intel from the DoD and special forces “advisers” on the ground? Well, NATO officials have said that a loss in Ukraine is not acceptable; meaning, they will escalate.
It’s hard to say yet what that would entail – Russia has already weathered all sanctions and economic tactics deployed by the west with the help of trading partners like China and India. They have even survived being removed from the SWIFT network. Escalation would have to entail direct contact.
It is my belief that the Ukraine event is just one part of a larger chain reaction. With NATO weakened after throwing billions in cash into Ukraine along with a large supply of arms, it seems obvious to me that this is an opportune time for another conflict elsewhere which NATO will be ill equipped to respond to. China is in a perfect position to invade Taiwan, for example.
Ukraine is a useful powderkeg, but not the only powderkeg."
"Loss is not acceptable" is a PR BS. It is not like Russia is invading europe. The war will be stopped just like afgan op. NATO will withdraw and case closed.
He basically bat 1,000 on how this proxy war would go. First he predicted that the a war in Ukraine was plan B because the Great Reset didn't go the elite's way. Second, due to propaganda by Ukraine and NATO, Russia was getting into position to attack Ukraine's infrastructure. Now he is predicting that Ukraine will be getting long range missiles while Russia is planning an offensive from the north.
Summary?
Here's the conclusion:
"The question is, what happens after that? What happens when Russia takes considerable ground in Ukraine despite hundreds of billions of dollars in NATO aid, advanced armaments, intel from the DoD and special forces “advisers” on the ground? Well, NATO officials have said that a loss in Ukraine is not acceptable; meaning, they will escalate.
It’s hard to say yet what that would entail – Russia has already weathered all sanctions and economic tactics deployed by the west with the help of trading partners like China and India. They have even survived being removed from the SWIFT network. Escalation would have to entail direct contact.
It is my belief that the Ukraine event is just one part of a larger chain reaction. With NATO weakened after throwing billions in cash into Ukraine along with a large supply of arms, it seems obvious to me that this is an opportune time for another conflict elsewhere which NATO will be ill equipped to respond to. China is in a perfect position to invade Taiwan, for example.
Ukraine is a useful powderkeg, but not the only powderkeg."
Thanks!
"Loss is not acceptable" is a PR BS. It is not like Russia is invading europe. The war will be stopped just like afgan op. NATO will withdraw and case closed.
He basically bat 1,000 on how this proxy war would go. First he predicted that the a war in Ukraine was plan B because the Great Reset didn't go the elite's way. Second, due to propaganda by Ukraine and NATO, Russia was getting into position to attack Ukraine's infrastructure. Now he is predicting that Ukraine will be getting long range missiles while Russia is planning an offensive from the north.
Very insightful!