I can sauce you into oblivion my friend. That's what I do! Here are the highlights:
Nobody has ever found/isolated/purified an alleged unicorn virus from a biological sample in the history of humankind - never been done.
Nobody has ever demonstrated through a scientific experiment that even the mixture of fluids from a sick person transmits disease to a healthy person. Not for unicorn-viruses, nor with bacteria. Koch's Postulates have never been satisfed. In fact, they don't try anymore in the last 70 years, having failed miserably thousands of times from 1900 - 1950.
From 1954-1996, the "viral culturing" method was solely used to MANUFACTURE the APPEARANCE of so-called viruses by poisoning monkey kidney cells with anti-biotics (against-lifes). This is an undeniably fraudulent process as the fluids/tissue of the sick person added to the toxic culture mix are never checked for the presence of any virus, let alone the virus allegedly in question.
Post viral culturing, researchers take samples of the decayed monkey kidney cells, put them on slides doused in toxic heavy metals and then take pictures of all the random breakdown particles and call some of them "viruses" without demonstrating they possess any properties of so-called viruses, like showing how they "take over the cell's machinery" and "self-replicate". Such activity has never been witnessed because it CANNOT be witnessed due to the limitations of electron microscopy which requires the killing of the sample in order to view it under the heavy-light and within the heavy metals stain.
Since 1997, pseudoscientists have invented another process for allegedly detecting unicorn-viruses called "sequencing" or "metagenomic sequencing" or "Sanger sequencing". As usual, the lie is built right into the name of the process as they do no such thing known as "sequencing" where scientists take the full genome of a sample, like a carrot or a rabbit, and then snip it up into different picees to study it. With our mysterious unicorn-viruses, they don't do this because nobody can find a FULLY INTACT unicorn-virus in the real world. So instead, they invented a process of ASSEMBLING random fragments of RNA they sample in the bodily fluids of a sick person. Can they demonstrate these random RNA fragments are not just fragmented human RNA as a result of natural apoptosis that goes on in the body 24x7? Why, what a shock, not they can't! These pseudoscientists cannot prove the provenance of these RNA fragments. Occam's razor suggests the simplest explanation is that it's just human RNA fragments until proven otherwise. So these pseudoscientists use their computer software to assemble all these random RNA fragments they find in the fluid sample and when they get to a size they invented for what a unicorn-virus might entail, they say "Look, there it is"! Funny how they can never fund a fully intact virus strand in these samples, eh?
Virologists (aka massive pseudoscientists) claim they can't find any viruses in the real world, in the fluid or tissue samples of sick people for one of two reasons. Either they say "there isn't enough there to find" or they say "the viruses are all hidden inside the cell membrane". Both are of course bald-faced lies. They say this out of one side of their mouth while telling you out of other that somebody standing 5.99 feet or less away from you can shoot a microscopic piece of spittle your way, that you inadvertently breath in that is TEAMING with active viruses. These two stances cannot be reconciled of course. Because both are lies.
It should be noted that from the onset of Louis Pasteur, one of the biggest frauds of all time, in 1880 all the way to 1935, all the alleged viruses that caused massive amounts of death, like rabies, small pox, polio, Spanish Flu, etc. COULD NOT EVEN BE SEEN OR FOUND with the technology in use at that time. In those days, a "virus" was defined as an organism that was smaller than a bacteria, which could be seen. So hundreds of millions of deaths were blamed on something that was purely THEORETICAL, having never been shown to exist. Fast forward to today and the same is true.
How's that for some sauce?
Now, I've pink-pilled thousands of people to this day, and I can hear what you're likely thinking. But what about flus, colds, Covid, chicken pox, measles, etc. etc. I wrote some lengthy posts a few months ago here on GA that addressed all these major so-called "viral dis-eases" and what really causes them. If you ask I'll share those links with you. But here's the short answer, fear & judgment and all their adjunct thoughts/feelings are the cause of the vast majority of "viral dis-eases". In some cases, toxins/poisons are also part of it, but less so.
If you enjoy or prefer videos, here are three of the better ones as of late that you can watch at your leisure to get up to speed with the lie that germ theory is. Enjoy!!
Glad you liked it. I put ChatGPT to the test on the Virology-Lie the other day to see if it could defend virology and caught it out in two deliberate lies which it abruptly apologized to me for, admitting it was mistaken in its previous responses when called out, and then told me I had "asked too many questions in an hour" and shut me down...lol.
Very nice write up thank you! I admit I haven't watched the videos yet or looked much further than this comment but, can you give me an explanation for what seems to be apparent transmission? Ie: chickenpox parties, coworkers/families having near identical symptoms etc. Thanks again for the info.
In one word "Fear". Fear's cousin variants -> worry, concern, scare, fright.
Note most all the "viruses" we are told we "pass to each other" (cold, flu, covid, etc.) register in the bronchi and lungs, as your psyche translates your figurative worry/concern thoughts as literal and goes about generating more oxygen in the body as when people are fearful/worried/concerned, like a predator being stalked by prey, they unconsciously become more still as their breathing becomes more shallow so as not to be detected (primitive instinct). During scare/fright events, the psyche widens the bronchial passages so more oxygen can get through to the lungs during the shallow breathing. When the scare/fright subsides, the psyche then rebuilds the bronchial passages with the assistance of bacteria it creates to the way they were before and this is when we "feel sick". Also, in cases of more extreme fear, like fear of death, the psyche generates excess lung alveoli tissue to greatly increase oxygen uptake, which our medical establishment names "lung cancer". If we get over the fear of death, TB mycobacteria go about removing this excess lung tissue and this is what in the olden days was named "tuberculosis" or "consumption", but today, our medical establishment still calls this "lung cancer" too due to its profitability. Good times, eh? Pneumonia is the scare-fright bronchial/lung conflict program coupled with an existence/abandonment conflict program (the classic hospitalization conflict) which causes excess water retention throughout the body, which can be quite deadly when in the process of healing a lung/bronchial program as excess water in the lungs causes one to drown.
Chicken pox, measles and rubella are all forms of separation conflicts which happen when children are separated from their mother's primarily. See my other comment here for more detail on why this happens. The chicken pox party is another type of conflict known as an "attack or feeling soiled conflict", which is identical to what adult shingles is caused by. The attack conflict affects the secondary layer of the skin, the dermis, and presents differently than the separation conflict which affects the nerve-endings of the outer epidermis. A skillful eye can distinguish between the child who suffered the original separation conflict versus the child who suffered the attack/feeling-soiled conflict from the party. At a casual glance however, you only see rash/bumps/pustules/pox in both cases. Measles and rubella are milder forms of the separation conflict that are resolved more quickly than those who present with chicken pox. As such, the measles patient is in the early stages of nerve-end desensitizing when the conflict is resolved which is why you only see the patterned redness beneath the skin rather than the pox that break through the skin.
I can sauce you into oblivion my friend. That's what I do! Here are the highlights:
Nobody has ever found/isolated/purified an alleged unicorn virus from a biological sample in the history of humankind - never been done.
Nobody has ever demonstrated through a scientific experiment that even the mixture of fluids from a sick person transmits disease to a healthy person. Not for unicorn-viruses, nor with bacteria. Koch's Postulates have never been satisfed. In fact, they don't try anymore in the last 70 years, having failed miserably thousands of times from 1900 - 1950.
From 1954-1996, the "viral culturing" method was solely used to MANUFACTURE the APPEARANCE of so-called viruses by poisoning monkey kidney cells with anti-biotics (against-lifes). This is an undeniably fraudulent process as the fluids/tissue of the sick person added to the toxic culture mix are never checked for the presence of any virus, let alone the virus allegedly in question.
Post viral culturing, researchers take samples of the decayed monkey kidney cells, put them on slides doused in toxic heavy metals and then take pictures of all the random breakdown particles and call some of them "viruses" without demonstrating they possess any properties of so-called viruses, like showing how they "take over the cell's machinery" and "self-replicate". Such activity has never been witnessed because it CANNOT be witnessed due to the limitations of electron microscopy which requires the killing of the sample in order to view it under the heavy-light and within the heavy metals stain.
Since 1997, pseudoscientists have invented another process for allegedly detecting unicorn-viruses called "sequencing" or "metagenomic sequencing" or "Sanger sequencing". As usual, the lie is built right into the name of the process as they do no such thing known as "sequencing" where scientists take the full genome of a sample, like a carrot or a rabbit, and then snip it up into different picees to study it. With our mysterious unicorn-viruses, they don't do this because nobody can find a FULLY INTACT unicorn-virus in the real world. So instead, they invented a process of ASSEMBLING random fragments of RNA they sample in the bodily fluids of a sick person. Can they demonstrate these random RNA fragments are not just fragmented human RNA as a result of natural apoptosis that goes on in the body 24x7? Why, what a shock, not they can't! These pseudoscientists cannot prove the provenance of these RNA fragments. Occam's razor suggests the simplest explanation is that it's just human RNA fragments until proven otherwise. So these pseudoscientists use their computer software to assemble all these random RNA fragments they find in the fluid sample and when they get to a size they invented for what a unicorn-virus might entail, they say "Look, there it is"! Funny how they can never fund a fully intact virus strand in these samples, eh?
Virologists (aka massive pseudoscientists) claim they can't find any viruses in the real world, in the fluid or tissue samples of sick people for one of two reasons. Either they say "there isn't enough there to find" or they say "the viruses are all hidden inside the cell membrane". Both are of course bald-faced lies. They say this out of one side of their mouth while telling you out of other that somebody standing 5.99 feet or less away from you can shoot a microscopic piece of spittle your way, that you inadvertently breath in that is TEAMING with active viruses. These two stances cannot be reconciled of course. Because both are lies.
It should be noted that from the onset of Louis Pasteur, one of the biggest frauds of all time, in 1880 all the way to 1935, all the alleged viruses that caused massive amounts of death, like rabies, small pox, polio, Spanish Flu, etc. COULD NOT EVEN BE SEEN OR FOUND with the technology in use at that time. In those days, a "virus" was defined as an organism that was smaller than a bacteria, which could be seen. So hundreds of millions of deaths were blamed on something that was purely THEORETICAL, having never been shown to exist. Fast forward to today and the same is true.
How's that for some sauce?
Now, I've pink-pilled thousands of people to this day, and I can hear what you're likely thinking. But what about flus, colds, Covid, chicken pox, measles, etc. etc. I wrote some lengthy posts a few months ago here on GA that addressed all these major so-called "viral dis-eases" and what really causes them. If you ask I'll share those links with you. But here's the short answer, fear & judgment and all their adjunct thoughts/feelings are the cause of the vast majority of "viral dis-eases". In some cases, toxins/poisons are also part of it, but less so.
If you enjoy or prefer videos, here are three of the better ones as of late that you can watch at your leisure to get up to speed with the lie that germ theory is. Enjoy!!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jajyAdPMdzfJ/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ch8v4TVL9yq0/?list=KG91OQNvOcCA&randomize=false
https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Virology-on-trial-part-9:c
Nice and concise. Great writeup! Saved~
Glad you liked it. I put ChatGPT to the test on the Virology-Lie the other day to see if it could defend virology and caught it out in two deliberate lies which it abruptly apologized to me for, admitting it was mistaken in its previous responses when called out, and then told me I had "asked too many questions in an hour" and shut me down...lol.
Very nice write up thank you! I admit I haven't watched the videos yet or looked much further than this comment but, can you give me an explanation for what seems to be apparent transmission? Ie: chickenpox parties, coworkers/families having near identical symptoms etc. Thanks again for the info.
In one word "Fear". Fear's cousin variants -> worry, concern, scare, fright.
Note most all the "viruses" we are told we "pass to each other" (cold, flu, covid, etc.) register in the bronchi and lungs, as your psyche translates your figurative worry/concern thoughts as literal and goes about generating more oxygen in the body as when people are fearful/worried/concerned, like a predator being stalked by prey, they unconsciously become more still as their breathing becomes more shallow so as not to be detected (primitive instinct). During scare/fright events, the psyche widens the bronchial passages so more oxygen can get through to the lungs during the shallow breathing. When the scare/fright subsides, the psyche then rebuilds the bronchial passages with the assistance of bacteria it creates to the way they were before and this is when we "feel sick". Also, in cases of more extreme fear, like fear of death, the psyche generates excess lung alveoli tissue to greatly increase oxygen uptake, which our medical establishment names "lung cancer". If we get over the fear of death, TB mycobacteria go about removing this excess lung tissue and this is what in the olden days was named "tuberculosis" or "consumption", but today, our medical establishment still calls this "lung cancer" too due to its profitability. Good times, eh? Pneumonia is the scare-fright bronchial/lung conflict program coupled with an existence/abandonment conflict program (the classic hospitalization conflict) which causes excess water retention throughout the body, which can be quite deadly when in the process of healing a lung/bronchial program as excess water in the lungs causes one to drown.
Chicken pox, measles and rubella are all forms of separation conflicts which happen when children are separated from their mother's primarily. See my other comment here for more detail on why this happens. The chicken pox party is another type of conflict known as an "attack or feeling soiled conflict", which is identical to what adult shingles is caused by. The attack conflict affects the secondary layer of the skin, the dermis, and presents differently than the separation conflict which affects the nerve-endings of the outer epidermis. A skillful eye can distinguish between the child who suffered the original separation conflict versus the child who suffered the attack/feeling-soiled conflict from the party. At a casual glance however, you only see rash/bumps/pustules/pox in both cases. Measles and rubella are milder forms of the separation conflict that are resolved more quickly than those who present with chicken pox. As such, the measles patient is in the early stages of nerve-end desensitizing when the conflict is resolved which is why you only see the patterned redness beneath the skin rather than the pox that break through the skin.