2045? Hahahaha.
Cold fusion has already been proven to occur in nano-ruptured paladium. The hydroton theory is fascinating and worth looking into, but this "hot fusion" stuff seems just as much a scam as the green energy movement. Edmund Storms has several presentations on the subject, and the field of research has been underway for decades
People on youtube are also already doing boron-hydrogen fusion in the garages, completely open source.
If we let these mega corporations run these power projects, they'll just keep edging them years and years into the future. There are real and ground-level achievable approaches that we don't even think about, or are disconnected from the mainstream attention. Remember the thorium reactors that were all the hype a few years back? Where's the development there? Stonewalled by regulation? Lack of investor interest because of misunderstanding the tech?
I mean, there is the Deep State Mapping Project which has been going on for quite a while now.
Although I think it's best that everyone develop their own understanding of what's going on, and part of that is the process of personally taking notes and constructing their own mental databases. The better we can share and reference our own interests, the better the propagation signal strength.
No one really appreciates statements like "oh yeah, I saw a link on that. oh well I can't find it," but everyone loves "oh yeah, here's several related links, and some notes on what I found interesting on that particular subject."
Decentralized research is how we go to where we are today, reverting back to "master editors" or "admins" of shared documentation means that there's a potential for infiltration or sliding. We immunize ourselves from that by diy'ing our own research and then sharing between each other said "databases"
With things like thebrain, you have to hand-stitch everything together. It's somewhat useful if actually diagnosing linear events, or construction/engineering processes, since those are often static.
With zettle-like notetaking, you may find connections between things that you normally wouldn't think to link together, or not spend the time hand-stitching together.
I was once doing a completely isolated dive into homeopathy and the way it seems to interact with water structure an the molecular level. I realized this tied in with certain atomic crystaline geometries, so without distracting myself from the specific research I was doing at the moment, I simply added a tag to my other research: something like #crystals #salts #zeolites #quantumchemistry #electro-biology for instance
Later, when viewing "the graph" (which is the auto-organized linkages between notes, I could see and also recall there was a connection between those two seemingly discrete areas of interest. This "short circuit" allows me to expand thinking and find connections between things without the need to hand-build a structure.
The best use case for thebrain, imo, in this field of conspiracy research, would be to linearly depict and annotate event sequences. A sequence of q-proofs, or the way uranium one played out, or the timeline of earth history, financial history, etc. Those things are suited for static tree graphs since the events themselves are static in time.
The main issue with thebrain and static note structures, is that you may end up determining there's more connections to add to the graph, that interlink in inextricable ways, which makes it confoundingly difficult to try and hand-organize. Instead, a solution would be to have a "cloud" of notes, and then ask the cloud what's related to q, or money, or what x politician has been related to. This will then automatically draw the connections, allowing you to learn more from your own research in unforseen ways.
Which then, as I mentioned in this reply can be used to support a thesis or create a piece of useful content.
As an aside, it works exceptionally well for keeping track of posts/news pieces that are interesting but seemingly disconnected. I may find a good GAW post that has it's own way of describing how the Fed and Titanic are related, so I'll save that link into the zettle, along with tags of #fed #titanic #(names of those onboard). Later, I may one day make another note about those names that were onboard. Instead of reacting like "hmm, where have I heard that name before?" I can see that the name links back to the post. Now connections start to appear!
Let's say as another example: I create a note or series of notes for every mass shooting that has taken place, as they come up. I can now, in the future after taking said notes, say "show me mass shootings" and it'll bring up all of those notes that I took, which now I can use to see similarities or differences, again, without having to manually add or remove them from lists.
Here's an example of a logseq graph, any one of these nodes can be clicked on to show a sidebar of the page/note, and it will also show direct and indirect connections
Yes, but in most cases I use it to quickly construct citations, or find links from notes I've taken for relevant data I might be referencing in a conversation. Often the way people create notes or link things is entirely unique to the way their own mind works. So creating a document, a post, etc is the art of laying out context that constructs a narrative (or set of stacking relevant information) to support a thesis.
For example, if someone was to bring up directed energy weapons saying they don't exist, I can quickly conjure citations demonstrating that they do exist, here's how they're used, here's the current capabilities, how it relates to weather modification, etc. "Normally," that might take doing the research on the spot to try and find those links. Instead I've already created my own searchable database based on what I've previously reviewed.
Think of it mostly as a slowly built up mega compendium of everything you find interesting. And since it auto-organizes, you can quickly dig out what you know you wrote or how you've linked things together.
There's also applications like NotebookLM (and other ai assisted note-searching apps) that let you query your own notes in plain english, and it'll bring up your info as well as expanded info from associated links~ pretty cool stuff
When it comes to "sharing" I personally find it best to construct something and order it based on the context. Be it a discussion, twitter thread, blog post, video script, etc. Logseq and other zettlekasten tools allow me to quickly pull up what I already know I know, and use notes that I may have taken sporadically when those interests have arisen in the past.
Think of it as literally writing a note, tossing it in a big basket, but then being able to ask things like "show me everything I've written on electric universe theory" or whatever. It truly solves the "wait, where was that site again?" problem in keeping sources in order. The process of re-wringing or tagging things into this system helps reinforce memory as well, since well, you wrote it, and you know that it's in the system somewhere, without having to worry where.
I can tag notes, and it'll auto-organize the tree structure based on what's related to what. Each note is it's own discrete thing that's thrown into the mix of the "snowglobe" of notes, if you will. At any time if I want to search the information, all related trees and branches show up, rather than the traditional structuring where you have to organize it yourself.
So if I create a note that is titled "MH370" or something, I can tag it with #plane #disappearances #(region it was in) etc, then if I search the #plane tag, it might show ADS.b link, other plane incidents, the recent boeing suiciding, etc.
I highly advise you try it out, it's free and requires no subscription, and all of your notes are hosted on your own machine (Logseq)
I've used it since 2020 or so, and it's insanely boosted my ability to find links, notes, resources, etc. It's like building a search engine for your own mind.
Flashback to this video
She was paired up with the sportsball guy to help entrap more people into Pfizer ads. It's all a stage. Sure, if you don't wanna think about the metaphysical woo woo witch stuff that's fine, but it does indeed show WHO OWNS these entertainers and where that money and attention is being directed
This is probably hedge funds repositioning after they had to disclose their positions before eoQ423. Everything including 401ks have to reshuffle their positions in order to "disclose to investors" theat they're doing what they said they'd be doing.
Meanwhile, they're playing with your money. Think FTX.
"And I thought, oh my, if this is the case, the entirety of the US govt is committing securities fraud" (paraphrase of this)
etf will be timed with hype to capture people's interest (in sync with mockingbird media) to have people buy the top that they control. downspike into eoQ1 with earnings reports for major companies which will not look good. Seems like great bait for a fedcoin / CBDC to capitalize on the demoralization
Thinktanks haven't forgotten about the memetic and real utility cryptocurrencies have. They remember, quite well, that this can crush their monopoly game unless this adversary to their lies can be controlled. They're "insider-trading" the ETF timing to capture user value and ride hype into exploitation
came here to say this. it's a useful app, but still being monitored and skewed by the overrullers