Essentially we draw two sets of blood and place them in two containers that contain a liquid which helps bacteria grow. They’re incubated and tested to see if bacteria grows, if yes well the suspicion is confirmed and they do a gram stain to check what type of bacteria is at play. It is sort of a silly test in practice, since iv antibiotics are going to be given before the results if someone is septic enough to be in the ER, since it’s a rather lengthy process to do.
Right, I understand this. The microzyma/somatid (God particle) are programmed to morph into the bacteria at this stage. You are seeing pleomorphism/polymorphism underway. Something you weren't taught in medical/nursing school most likely.
But why do feel your tests don't line up with what I shared as they seem unrelated from my perspective?
I think I answered your first question here the second time you asked it above.
I don't understand this question. You don't understand why septic patients test positive for sepsis? Can you clarify?
Essentially we draw two sets of blood and place them in two containers that contain a liquid which helps bacteria grow. They’re incubated and tested to see if bacteria grows, if yes well the suspicion is confirmed and they do a gram stain to check what type of bacteria is at play. It is sort of a silly test in practice, since iv antibiotics are going to be given before the results if someone is septic enough to be in the ER, since it’s a rather lengthy process to do.
Right, I understand this. The microzyma/somatid (God particle) are programmed to morph into the bacteria at this stage. You are seeing pleomorphism/polymorphism underway. Something you weren't taught in medical/nursing school most likely.
But why do feel your tests don't line up with what I shared as they seem unrelated from my perspective?