Thoughts? Too far out there?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
More people won't be affected than will be. Now if there are 10 more, all over the country, then sure.
80% of the U.S. population lives in or East of the Mississippi River Basin.
I just don't see it killing that many people. They may try to use it as an excuse for the vaxxed getting cancer, but when the vaxxed are getting cancer on the west coast, midwest, and everywhere else not affected, it's going to be a hard sell.
Also, maybe this will help end train cars hauling liquids. You know what that would do to the deep states' easy money machine? Who owns the train cars/lines? Some of us have been screaming for years about pipelines being safer than train cars. The whole environmental movement is based on keeping train cars going, and nothing more. It was always about stopping pipelines, so they still had that easy money coming in to fund all their other BS. Why do you think the enviros aren't out in force? Because, trains are their lifeblood.
So, who benefits the most from trains going down? There is more to this than a chemical spill. This highlights how horrible trains are for transporting dangerous liquids.