Thoughts? Too far out there?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Yes and that's why it will provide cover. Because a sharp rise in cancer cases can easily be blamed on the chemical spills when a large percentage may actually be due to the jabs.
And we don't expect the government to distinguish between types of cancer, geographics or anything relevant, do we? They will cherry pick whatever data they need to support their propaganda.
Which is it?
or
I'm saying it would be impossible to conduct rigorous research to conclusively trace the cause to a specific event, but in the aggregate data there would still be a sharp rise in cancer which the government will just say it's due to hazmat exposure and ignore all the jab damage.
I get what you are saying. I expect it is part this and part they'll do a number of things to kills us simultaneously, making the cause/effect almost impossible to trace. I never really believed in the chem trails thing and haven't really looked into it. But I wouldn't doubt it. Every time I do dishes I think about that baby on the floor Q post, the implication being the stuff in our cleaning supplies is toxic. I think they have come at us as Schumer likes to say, "Six ways from Sunday."
some times I watch these conversations or are involved in them, and think, these people cannot be this obtuse, can they? then I remember forum sliding...