This study is the one used most when families ask if vaccines caused Dravet Syndrome.
But it doesn’t state for how long disorder onset could have been delayed if onset is inevitable. There is a lot of development that can happen before a baby has their first illness and first real immune challenge IF vaccines were suspended.
Not exactly a great source unless you happen to have an archive of a WebMD page showing the same text of the left part the image you posted, which would then be showing that they have deleted a page entirely, not edited one (obviously not suggesting this is any better, just you claim they edited the page when that appears to not be the case). You also link to two Twitter searches, not really sure what I'm supposed to be seeing there?
Obviously it isnt good, but its also not what you were talking about with your post, you were saying they edited a page, which hasn't happened from what I can tell.
WebMD edited their page, and i know this because i took a screen shot of their page one day, and then later i went back to the same page, and it had been edited. i knows its the same page, because i have it pop up in my browser history. i suspect that webMD edited their page, because i was driving traffic to it every day, before they made their edit.
Dravet Syndrome is a good rabbit hole to go down,
and Dravet Syndrome is also an excellent model for explaining how vaccines cause other kinds of problems.
Hence why I am asking if you have an archive of the other page, a completely different article mind you then the one on the right. You can look at the archive and see the that the article on the right has been on their site for years and hasn't changed that entire time. That means the absolute best source you have is your word and screen shot, not exactly the greatest source on the planet. Dravet Syndrome being or not being a rabbit hole has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. You say the page was edited but your screenshot is of two different articles, the one on the left I could only find on a different website entirely, the one on the right, well I've already pointed out that archive shows it hasn't been edited. If you mean to say they have deleted a page entirely, that is different than editing an article to say something different. It doesn't mean I would condone doing such a thing, but you are claiming the article was edited and other than your screenshot which is of two completely different articles, the only sources I can find suggest this is not the case.
So you link me to another one of your posts where you post the exact same photo. In other words you don't have any archive or any link to the completely different article on the left. They aren't edited man, it's 2 completely different articles! Archive even shows that the one you keep linking to has been the same for 6 years now! I'm not even commenting on anything related to Dravet Syndrome, merely that you seem to be completely fabricating the fact that WebMD edited their page. Outside of a dubious screenshot that doesn't show the URL whatsoever for the article on the left, which I've only been able to source from a website OTHER than WebMD, you have nothing to back this claim. You can go on and on about Dravet Syndrome, I'm not even talking about it, I'm talking about your claim that WebMD edited their page. All evidence points to you completely making this up. I don't even like WebMD, they are total frauds and give BS information that causes people with things like shoulder pain to believe they have terminal cancer. So I'm not supporting WebMD by any means. I am however questioning why you chose to post this dubious claim, how does it help anyone that might need to see this info if they look into it and find it's all BS?
Once again, do you have ANYTHING other than a screenshot for the article on the left of this image https://i.redd.it/qfrnb3bxiz711.png the original one you posted. Because, like I say, I can ONLY find this article with that exact text on a completely different website. Do you have an archive link? Or do you have the uncropped screenshot that shows a URL for the article on the left of the image? If not then this is an incredibly low effort post, I can put absolutely any text in a screenshot I want to. It seems totally obvious that the left image is a completely different article than the one on the right. The one on the right has an archive of that page dating back 6 years, IT HASNT CHANGED!!! The one on the left, like I said previously I can't even find on the WebMD website, so I've asked for a link, which you don't provide. As Joe Biden would say, Cmon man!
Wrong article! You are linking the right part of the image which is an article that hasn't changed since 2017, I want to see the one on the left! I literally linked an archive of that same page, I obviously know the URL for it.
The Dravet Foundation provides a better picture “earmarks of the disorder are seizures associated with vaccination” https://dravetfoundation.org/what-is-dravet-syndrome/
I’m sure this will too be swiftly edited and be changed to align with the Epilepsy Foundation. 🙄
These links were not helpful.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152151/
This study is the one used most when families ask if vaccines caused Dravet Syndrome.
But it doesn’t state for how long disorder onset could have been delayed if onset is inevitable. There is a lot of development that can happen before a baby has their first illness and first real immune challenge IF vaccines were suspended.
Can't find anything on WebMD for the left part of your screenshot, however I do find this: https://wa.kaiserpermanente.org/kbase/topic.jhtml?docId=nord377 which appears to have the same text though formatted slightly different, the image on the right appears to be a completely different article that has an archive from 2017 with the same text https://web.archive.org/web/20170624163910/https://www.webmd.com/epilepsy/what-is-dravet-syndrome
Not exactly a great source unless you happen to have an archive of a WebMD page showing the same text of the left part the image you posted, which would then be showing that they have deleted a page entirely, not edited one (obviously not suggesting this is any better, just you claim they edited the page when that appears to not be the case). You also link to two Twitter searches, not really sure what I'm supposed to be seeing there?
WebMD lies about vaccines and autism
https://old.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/116sbcj/webmd_lies_about_vaccines_and_autism/
Obviously it isnt good, but its also not what you were talking about with your post, you were saying they edited a page, which hasn't happened from what I can tell.
WebMD edited their page, and i know this because i took a screen shot of their page one day, and then later i went back to the same page, and it had been edited. i knows its the same page, because i have it pop up in my browser history. i suspect that webMD edited their page, because i was driving traffic to it every day, before they made their edit.
Dravet Syndrome is a good rabbit hole to go down,
and Dravet Syndrome is also an excellent model for explaining how vaccines cause other kinds of problems.
Hence why I am asking if you have an archive of the other page, a completely different article mind you then the one on the right. You can look at the archive and see the that the article on the right has been on their site for years and hasn't changed that entire time. That means the absolute best source you have is your word and screen shot, not exactly the greatest source on the planet. Dravet Syndrome being or not being a rabbit hole has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. You say the page was edited but your screenshot is of two different articles, the one on the left I could only find on a different website entirely, the one on the right, well I've already pointed out that archive shows it hasn't been edited. If you mean to say they have deleted a page entirely, that is different than editing an article to say something different. It doesn't mean I would condone doing such a thing, but you are claiming the article was edited and other than your screenshot which is of two completely different articles, the only sources I can find suggest this is not the case.
i appreciate the inspiration. thanks
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aANH4lrI/if-you-would-like-to-know-how-an/c/
So you link me to another one of your posts where you post the exact same photo. In other words you don't have any archive or any link to the completely different article on the left. They aren't edited man, it's 2 completely different articles! Archive even shows that the one you keep linking to has been the same for 6 years now! I'm not even commenting on anything related to Dravet Syndrome, merely that you seem to be completely fabricating the fact that WebMD edited their page. Outside of a dubious screenshot that doesn't show the URL whatsoever for the article on the left, which I've only been able to source from a website OTHER than WebMD, you have nothing to back this claim. You can go on and on about Dravet Syndrome, I'm not even talking about it, I'm talking about your claim that WebMD edited their page. All evidence points to you completely making this up. I don't even like WebMD, they are total frauds and give BS information that causes people with things like shoulder pain to believe they have terminal cancer. So I'm not supporting WebMD by any means. I am however questioning why you chose to post this dubious claim, how does it help anyone that might need to see this info if they look into it and find it's all BS?
Once again, do you have ANYTHING other than a screenshot for the article on the left of this image https://i.redd.it/qfrnb3bxiz711.png the original one you posted. Because, like I say, I can ONLY find this article with that exact text on a completely different website. Do you have an archive link? Or do you have the uncropped screenshot that shows a URL for the article on the left of the image? If not then this is an incredibly low effort post, I can put absolutely any text in a screenshot I want to. It seems totally obvious that the left image is a completely different article than the one on the right. The one on the right has an archive of that page dating back 6 years, IT HASNT CHANGED!!! The one on the left, like I said previously I can't even find on the WebMD website, so I've asked for a link, which you don't provide. As Joe Biden would say, Cmon man!
URL in address bar
https://i.redd.it/fsvaeni3fz711.png
Wrong article! You are linking the right part of the image which is an article that hasn't changed since 2017, I want to see the one on the left! I literally linked an archive of that same page, I obviously know the URL for it.
Edit: I'm referring to the left part of the picture you posted https://i.redd.it/qfrnb3bxiz711.png
Dirtbags!
Dirtbags everywhere . . .